California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. United States of America

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/31/17 ORDERING that the matter is STAYED until 3/1/2018. On or before 11/1/2017, the parties shall file a proposed Consent Decree with the Court. In the event that a proposed Consent Decree cannot be filed with the Court by 11/1/17, the parties agree to file a joint status report notifying the Court of the status of the approvals.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California SUSAN S. FIERING, State Bar No. 121621 Supervising Deputy Attorney General ROSE B. FUA, State Bar No. 119757 HEATHER C. LESLIE, State Bar No. 305095 Deputy Attorneys General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-7832 Fax: (916) 327-2319 E-mail: Heather.Leslie@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for California Department of Toxic Substances Control 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL, 2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO Plaintiff, CONTINUE THE STAY 15 16 v. 17 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Judge: John A. Mendez Action Filed: December 9, 2016 18 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order To Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC) 1 Plaintiff, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (“DTSC”) and Defendant, the 2 United States of America (“United States”) hereby submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 3 to Continue the Stay and to postpone the deadline for dispositional papers. Dispositional papers 4 are currently due on or before September 1, 2017. DTSC and the United States stipulate to lodge 5 the proposed Consent Decree by November 1, 2017. 6 BACKGROUND 7 On or about December 9, 2016, DTSC initiated the above-captioned case, seeking cost 8 recovery and declaratory relief under sections 107(a) and 113(g) of the Comprehensive 9 Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a) 10 and 9613(g). The matter concerns the properties known as 711 and 750 Jackson Street, Benicia, 11 Solano County, California (identified by Assessor’s Parcel number 0080-14-0440) and 938, 940, 12 942, 945, 946, 952, and 954 Tyler Street; 963, 965, 967, 969, 971, 973, 977, 979, 981, 983, 985, 13 989, and 991 Lincoln Street; and 900 and 954 Jackson Street, Benicia, Solano County, California 14 (identified by Assessor’s Parcel numbers 0080-28-0010, 0080-28-0030, 0080-28-0040, 0080-28- 15 0050) and all locations where hazardous substances released at, in, or from those addresses may 16 come to be located in the future (the “Site”). On April 27, 2017 DTSC and the United States filed 17 a Joint Notice of Tentative Settlement and asked the Court for additional time to file dispositional 18 papers. On April 28, 2017 the Court filed a Minute Order that stayed the matter and instructed 19 the parties to file dispositional documents on or before September 1, 2017. 20 SETTLEMENT PROGRESS 21 DTSC and the United States have been negotiating in good faith to resolve this matter. 22 While staff attorneys have agreed upon the terms of the Consent Decree that will settle this matter, 23 authorized officials within these two government organizations still need to review and approve 24 the terms of the Consent Decree. In addition, the public, including the current and past owners of 25 the Site, will be provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed Consent Decree. DTSC 26 and the United States propose that the parties lodge a proposed Consent Decree approved by the 27 management of both governments on or before November 1. 28 1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC) 1 After the proposed Consent Decree is lodged, DTSC and the United States agree that a 60- 2 day comment period is appropriate. At the end of the comment period, DTSC will need to 3 respond to public comments. Since we do not know the nature or the number of the comments 4 that need to be answered, DTSC requests up to 30 days to respond to the comments. After those 5 30 days, or sooner, if possible, the parties will file with the Court motions for approval of the 6 proposed Consent Decree, unless public comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate 7 the proposed Consent Decree is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate, in which case DTSC may 8 withdraw or withhold its consent to entry of the Consent Decree. 9 STIPULATION 10 The parties hereby stipulate and agree that there is good cause for the Court to enter the 11 12 13 14 following order: 1. The matter is stayed until March 1, 2018. On or before November 1, 2017, the parties shall file a proposed Consent Decree with the Court. 2. In the event that a proposed Consent Decree cannot be filed with the Court by 15 November 1, 2017, the parties agree to file a joint status report notifying the Court of the status of 16 the approvals. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 Dated: August 31, 2017 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California SUSAN S. FIERING Supervising Deputy Attorney General 19 20 21 22 /s/ Heather Leslie ____________________________________ ROSE B. FUA HEATHER C. LESLIE Deputy Attorneys General Attorneys for the California Department of Toxic Substances Control 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC) 1 Dated: August 31, 2017 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 3 4 /s/ Mark Rigau (as authorized on 8/31/17) ___________________________________ MARK A. RIGAU Senior Trial Counsel Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice Attorneys for the United States of America 5 6 7 8 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 Dated: __8/31/2017_________________ /s/ John A. Mendez_________________ 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE JOHN A. MENDEZ 15 16 OK2015950029 33028804.doc 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Stay (2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?