Stacker et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
ORDER signed by District Judge George H. Wu on 5/31/17 ORDERING plaintiff(s) to SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than 6/15/2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (Kastilahn, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Valerie J. Stacker, et al. v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et
Present: The Honorable
May 31, 2017
GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
This Order is issued pursuant to FRCP 4(m), which requires that plaintiff(s) serve the summons and
complaint upon all defendants within 90 days after filing the complaint. The Court may dismiss the action prior to
the 90 days, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.
It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently,
including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also
pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case
must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1.
The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below.
Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than June 15,
2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution.
As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed
on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.
Proof of service of summons and complaint (applicable for defendant(s) who have not been served);
In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants
Request for entry of default by plaintiff(s) (applicable where defendants have been served but not
Motion for default judgment.
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted
upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due.
Initials of Preparer
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?