A.T. v. Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District et al
Filing
83
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/30/17: The deadline for the Parties to exchange initial disclosures shall be extended to thirty (30) days after the Court issues its rulings on Defendants' pending motions to dismiss Plaintiff's FAC. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
LOZANO SMITH
One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050
10
11
Sloan R. Simmons, SBN 233752
ssimmons@lozanosmith.com
Marcella L. Gutierrez, SBN 214224
mgutierrez@lozanosmith.com
Kristy J. Boyes, SBN 303975
kboyes@lozanosmith.com
LOZANO SMITH
One Capitol Mall, Suite 640
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
(916) 329-7433
Facsimile:
(916) 329-9050
Attorneys for Defendants
DRY CREEK JOINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
PLACER COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, PETER BALDO,
JUDY BENNEY, MARY BOEHM, BECKY BRAVO,
DEBBIE CANNON, STEPHANIE DILLBECK,
LISA HEWITT, LIZ LEE, VALERIE MILLER,
SANDRA MOORE, CYNDI STONE, JEN ROGERS,
CHRISTY CARTER, KATHLEEN ASHTON,
and DONNA KEARNS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
A.T., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad
Litem, L.T.,
18
19
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF
INITIAL DISCLOSURES
Plaintiff,
16
17
Case No. 2:16-cv-02925-MCE-DB
vs.
DRY CREEK JOINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT et al.,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXT. OF TIME FOR
EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES
1
A.T. v. DCJESD et al.
Case No. 2:16-cv-02925-MCE-DB
1
Plaintiff A.T., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, L.T. (“Plaintiff”), Individual
2
Placer County Office of Education Defendants Peter Baldo, Judy Benney, Mary Boehm, Becky Bravo,
3
Debbie Cannon, Stephanie Dillbeck, Lisa Hewitt, Liz Lee, Valerie Miller, Sandra Moore, Cyndi Stone,
4
KD Ashton, Christy Carter, Donna Kearns, and Jen Rogers (“PCOE Individual Defendants”), and
5
Individual Placer County Children’s System of Care Defendants Renee Verdugo, David Moul, Lauri
6
McNally, Carley Rose Jackson, Tammy Peterson, Rebecca Ratekin, and Wendy Devore (“CSOC
7
Individual Defendants” and, collectively with Plaintiff and the PCOE Individual Defendants, the
8
“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
9
1.
WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated to extending the time to exchange initial
LOZANO SMITH
One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050
10
disclosures until six weeks after Defendants’ filed an answer or six weeks after a hearing date for a
11
motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (see ECF Doc. No. 68);
12
2.
WHEREAS, Defendants’ filed their respective motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC on
13
September 18, 2017 (see ECF Doc. Nos. 72, 74), with a scheduled hearing date of October 19, 2017,
14
that was subsequently vacated by the Court;
15
3.
WHEREAS, based upon the Court’s vacating of the October 19, 2017 hearing date, the
16
deadline to exchange initial disclosures under the parties prior stipulation defaulted to November 30,
17
2017;
18
4.
WHEREAS, Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC remain pending before and
19
under submission with the Court, and the Parties acknowledge that the Court’s ruling could result in
20
dismissal of the subject action, in its entirety; and
21
5.
WHEREAS, the Parties are interested in preventing the accrual of unnecessary costs and
22
expenses with regard to initial disclosures, in light of the possibility that this action may be dismissed
23
entirely, with prejudice.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXT. OF TIME FOR
EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES
2
A.T. v. DCJESD et al.
Case No. 2:16-cv-02925-MCE-DB
1
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 26 (a)(1)(C), the Parties jointly request and HEREBY
2
STIPULATE that the deadline for initial disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) for this action be
3
extended to thirty (30) days after this Court issues its rulings on Defendants’ motions to dismiss the
4
FAC. IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
Dated: November 27, 2017
6
LOZANO SMITH
7
/s/ Sloan R. Simmons
SLOAN R. SIMMONS
MARCY GUTIERREZ
KRISTY J. BOYES
Attorneys for Defendants DRY CREEK JOINT
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
PLACER COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, PETER
BALDO, JUDY BENNEY, MARY BOEHM, BECKY
BRAVO, DEBBIE CANNON, STEPHANIE DILLBECK,
LISA HEWITT, LIZ LEE, VALERIE MILLER,
SANDRA MOORE, CYNDI STONE, JEN ROGERS,
CHRISTY CARTER, KATHLEEN ASHTON,
and DONNA KEARNS.
8
9
LOZANO SMITH
One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050
10
11
12
13
14
15
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: November 27, 2017
PLACER COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE
16
/s/ Julia M. Reeves
JULIA M. REEVES
Attorneys for Defendants PLACER COUNTY
CHILDREN’S SYSTEM OF CARE, RENEE VERDUGO,
DAVID MOUL, LAURI MCNALLY, CARLEY ROSE
JACKSON, TAMMY PETERSON, REBECCA
RATEKIN, and WENDY DEVORE
17
18
19
20
21
Dated: November 27, 2017
22
THE ZALKIN LAW FIRM
/s/ Ryan M. Cohen
IRWIN M. ZALKIN
DEVIN M. STOREY
ALEXANDER S. ZALKIN
RYAN M. COHEN
JACQUELINE J. MCQUARRIE
Attorneys for Plaintiff A.T., a minor, by and through
his Guardian Ad Litem, L.T.
23
24
25
26
27
28
*Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other
signatories thereto has been obtained.
JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXT. OF TIME FOR
EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES
3
A.T. v. DCJESD et al.
Case No. 2:16-cv-02925-MCE-DB
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
3
ORDERED that the deadline for the Parties to exchange initial disclosures shall be extended to thirty
4
(30) days after the Court issues its rulings on Defendants’ pending motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 30, 2017
7
8
9
LOZANO SMITH
One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXT. OF TIME FOR
EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES
4
A.T. v. DCJESD et al.
Case No. 2:16-cv-02925-MCE-DB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?