Williams v. Paramo

Filing 4

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/22/17 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KENNETH WILLIAMS,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-2928 KJN P

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

DANIEL PARAMO,
Respondents.

16
17

By an order filed January 4, 2017, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis

18

affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would be

19

dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s

20

order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a

22

district judge to this case; and

23

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

27

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

28

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the
1

1

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

2

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: February 22, 2017

4
5
/will2928.fpf.hab

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2