Flores v. Lee et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/08/17 ordering plaintiff shall, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, submit: (1) an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided herewith by the Clerk of Court, OR (2) the required fees in the amount of $400.00. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel 4 is denied without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed InForma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Plummer, M) Modified on 2/9/2017 (Plummer, M).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY FLORES,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-2947 AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
B. LEE, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. Plaintiff has
19
consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned Magistrate Judge for all purposes pursuant to 28
20
U.S.C. § 636(c), and Local Rule 305(a). See ECF No. 4.
21
Plaintiff has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee, which
22
is required to commence this action. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). By order filed
23
December 29, 2016, plaintiff was informed that failure to submit an application to proceed in
24
forma pauperis or the filing fee, within thirty days, would result in the dismissal of this action.
25
See ECF No. 3. That deadline has passed. Plaintiff may have abandoned this action because he
26
has obtained his requested medical care; if this is true, plaintiff should so inform the court.
27
Meanwhile, due to the seriousness of plaintiff’s allegations, the court will accord him additional
28
time – 21 days from the filing date of this order – to submit an in forma pauperis application or to
1
1
2
pay the filing fee. No further extensions of time will be granted.
Finally, on the form providing plaintiff’s consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned
3
magistrate judge, plaintiff requests appointment of counsel. See ECF No. 4. This is an
4
inappropriate method for requesting appointment of counsel. Should this action proceed, and
5
should plaintiff seek appointment of counsel, he must file a separate request. See Palmer v.
6
Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (appointment of counsel may be made only in
7
exceptional circumstances that include an evaluation of the plaintiff’s ability to articulate his
8
claims pro se and his likelihood of success).
9
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
10
1. Plaintiff shall, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, submit: (1) an affidavit
11
in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided herewith by the Clerk
12
of Court, OR (2) the required fees in the amount of $400.00.
13
14
2. Failure to timely comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action
without prejudice.
15
3. Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 4, is denied without prejudice.
16
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In
17
Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.
18
DATED: February 8, 2017
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?