Douglas v. Huffman

Filing 20

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/1/2017 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days to file an amended complaint. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RAYMOND M. DOUGLAS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-02953-TLN-AC

v.

ORDER

HUFFMAN,

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a

17
18

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On June 12, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which

19
20

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed

22

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

23
24

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

25

ORDERED that:

26

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 12, 2017, are adopted in full;

27

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted; and

28

///
1

1

3. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with 30 days to file an amended complaint.

2
3

Dated: August 1, 2017

4
5
6

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2