California River Watch v. Sweeney et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/3/2017 ORDERING that Defendants time to respond to discovery is EXTENDED to 6/12/2017. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JOHN BRISCOE (053223)
LAWRENCE S. BAZEL (114641)
MAX ROLLENS (308984)
BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP
155 Sansome Street, Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
JOHN D. SWEENEY and POINT BUCKLER CLUB, LLC (also sued as Point Buckler, LLC)

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH,
Plaintiff,

12
13

v.

14

JOHN DONNELLY SWEENEY; POINT
BUCKLER, LLC; POINT BUCKLER CLUB,
LLC; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive;

15

No.

2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO DISCOVERY UNTIL JUNE
12, 2017
Courtroom: 3
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION

NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN

1

STIPULATION

2

Plaintiff California River Watch (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants John D. Sweeney and Point

3

Buckler Club, LLC (also sued as Point Buckler, LLC) (collectively “Defendants) hereby stipulate as

4

follows:

5

1.

On March 29, 2017, Plaintiff served Defendants with (1) Plaintiff’s First Requests

6

For Admission to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney, (2) Plaintiff’s First Request For Production of

7

Documents and ESI to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney, and (3) Plaintiff’s First Set of

8

Interrogatories to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney.

9

2.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 provides, in pertinent part, that “Unless the court

10

orders otherwise, the parties may stipulate that: . . . (b) other procedures governing or limiting

11

discovery be modified—but a stipulation extending the time for any form of discovery must have

12

court approval if it would interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for hearing a motion,

13

or for trial.”

14
15

3.

On February 24, 2017, the Court took under submission Defendants’ motion to

dismiss, and set a case management conference for June 8, 2017.

16

4.

In light of Defendants’ pending motion, which if granted would moot Plaintiff’s

17

discovery requests, and the scheduled case management conference, the parties hereby stipulate to

18

extend until June 12, 2017 Defendants time to respond to the discovery requests listed in paragraph 1

19

above.

20
21

5.

This stipulation will not interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for

hearing a motion, or for trial, because there are no such dates currently set.

22
23

DATED: April 27, 2017.

BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP

24
25
26

By:
Lawrence S. Bazel
Attorneys for Defendants JOHN D. SWEENEY
and POINT BUCKLER CLUB, LLC (also sued as
Point Buckler, LLC)

27
28

1
STIPULATION

NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN

1
2

DATED: April 27, 2017.

LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER

3
4

By:

5

/s/ Jack Silver
Jack Silver
Attorney for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH

6
7

DATED: April 27, 2017.

LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD E. YATES

8
By:

9
10

/e/ Edward E. Yates
Edward E. Yates
Attorney for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14

DATED: May 3, 2017

15

By:

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION

NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN