California River Watch v. Sweeney et al
Filing
37
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/3/17, ORDERING that the time for Defendants to respond to the discovery request is EXTENDED until eight (8) days after the case management conference. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JOHN BRISCOE (053223)
LAWRENCE S. BAZEL (114641)
LAUREN D. BERNADETT (295251)
BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP
155 Sansome Street, Seventh Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel (415) 402-2700
Fax (415) 398-5630
jbriscoe@briscoelaw.net
lbazel@briscoelaw.net
lbernadett@briscoelaw.net
Attorneys for Defendants
JOHN D. SWEENEY and POINT BUCKLER CLUB, LLC (also sued as Point Buckler, LLC)
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH,
Plaintiff,
12
13
JOHN DONNELLY SWEENEY; POINT
BUCKLER, LLC; POINT BUCKLER CLUB,
LLC; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive;
2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO DISCOVERY
v.
14
No.
15
16
Courtroom: 3
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY
NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN
1
2
STIPULATION
Plaintiff California River Watch (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants John D. Sweeney and Point
3
Buckler Club, LLC (also sued as Point Buckler, LLC) (collectively “Defendants”) hereby stipulate
4
as follows:
5
1.
On March 29, 2017, Plaintiff served Defendants with (1) Plaintiff’s First Requests
6
For Admission to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney, (2) Plaintiff’s First Request For Production of
7
Documents and ESI to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney, and (3) Plaintiff’s First Set of
8
Interrogatories to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney.
9
2.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 provides, in pertinent part, that “Unless the court
10
orders otherwise, the parties may stipulate that: . . . (b) other procedures governing or limiting
11
discovery be modified—but a stipulation extending the time for any form of discovery must have
12
court approval if it would interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for hearing a motion,
13
or for trial.”
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
3.
On February 24, 2017, the Court took under submission Defendants’ motion to
dismiss, and set a case management conference for June 8, 2017.
4.
On June 1, 2017, the Court vacated the June 8, 2017 case management conference
and reset it to July 6, 2017.
5.
On June 27, 2017, the Court vacated the July 6, 2017 case management conference
and reset it to August 17, 2017.
6.
Due to unavailability of counsel on August 17, parties are seeking to reschedule the
case management conference.
7.
In light of Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss, which if granted would moot
23
Plaintiff’s discovery requests, and the rescheduled case management conference, the parties hereby
24
stipulate to extend Defendants’ time to respond to the discovery requests listed in paragraph 1 above.
25
Defendants’ time to respond is extended until eight (8) days after the case management conference.
26
27
8.
This stipulation will not interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for
hearing a motion, or for trial, because there are no such dates currently set.
28
1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY
NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN
1
2
9.
In addition, Plaintiff agrees to re-notice the deposition of Defendant John Donnelly
Sweeney to a date after Defendants respond to the discovery requests.
3
4
5
6
DATED: July 11, 2017.
BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP
7
8
By:
9
Lawrence S. Bazel
Attorneys for Defendants JOHN D. SWEENEY
and POINT BUCKLER CLUB, LLC (also sued as
Point Buckler, LLC)
10
11
12
DATED: July 11, 2017.
LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER
13
14
By:
15
16
17
DATED: July 11, 2017.
/s/ Jack Silver as authorized on July 13, 2017
Jack Silver
Attorney for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH
LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD E. YATES
18
19
By: /s/ Edward E. Yates as authorized on July 13, 2017
Edward E. Yates
Attorney for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH
20
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 3, 2017
25
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
2
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY
NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?