California River Watch v. Sweeney et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/3/17, ORDERING that the time for Defendants to respond to the discovery request is EXTENDED until eight (8) days after the case management conference. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JOHN BRISCOE (053223) LAWRENCE S. BAZEL (114641) LAUREN D. BERNADETT (295251) BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP 155 Sansome Street, Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel (415) 402-2700 Fax (415) 398-5630 jbriscoe@briscoelaw.net lbazel@briscoelaw.net lbernadett@briscoelaw.net Attorneys for Defendants JOHN D. SWEENEY and POINT BUCKLER CLUB, LLC (also sued as Point Buckler, LLC) 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, Plaintiff, 12 13 JOHN DONNELLY SWEENEY; POINT BUCKLER, LLC; POINT BUCKLER CLUB, LLC; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY v. 14 No. 15 16 Courtroom: 3 Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN 1 2 STIPULATION Plaintiff California River Watch (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants John D. Sweeney and Point 3 Buckler Club, LLC (also sued as Point Buckler, LLC) (collectively “Defendants”) hereby stipulate 4 as follows: 5 1. On March 29, 2017, Plaintiff served Defendants with (1) Plaintiff’s First Requests 6 For Admission to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney, (2) Plaintiff’s First Request For Production of 7 Documents and ESI to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney, and (3) Plaintiff’s First Set of 8 Interrogatories to Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney. 9 2. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 29 provides, in pertinent part, that “Unless the court 10 orders otherwise, the parties may stipulate that: . . . (b) other procedures governing or limiting 11 discovery be modified—but a stipulation extending the time for any form of discovery must have 12 court approval if it would interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for hearing a motion, 13 or for trial.” 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 3. On February 24, 2017, the Court took under submission Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and set a case management conference for June 8, 2017. 4. On June 1, 2017, the Court vacated the June 8, 2017 case management conference and reset it to July 6, 2017. 5. On June 27, 2017, the Court vacated the July 6, 2017 case management conference and reset it to August 17, 2017. 6. Due to unavailability of counsel on August 17, parties are seeking to reschedule the case management conference. 7. In light of Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss, which if granted would moot 23 Plaintiff’s discovery requests, and the rescheduled case management conference, the parties hereby 24 stipulate to extend Defendants’ time to respond to the discovery requests listed in paragraph 1 above. 25 Defendants’ time to respond is extended until eight (8) days after the case management conference. 26 27 8. This stipulation will not interfere with the time set for completing discovery, for hearing a motion, or for trial, because there are no such dates currently set. 28 1 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN 1 2 9. In addition, Plaintiff agrees to re-notice the deposition of Defendant John Donnelly Sweeney to a date after Defendants respond to the discovery requests. 3 4 5 6 DATED: July 11, 2017. BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP 7 8 By: 9 Lawrence S. Bazel Attorneys for Defendants JOHN D. SWEENEY and POINT BUCKLER CLUB, LLC (also sued as Point Buckler, LLC) 10 11 12 DATED: July 11, 2017. LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER 13 14 By: 15 16 17 DATED: July 11, 2017. /s/ Jack Silver as authorized on July 13, 2017 Jack Silver Attorney for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD E. YATES 18 19 By: /s/ Edward E. Yates as authorized on July 13, 2017 Edward E. Yates Attorney for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 3, 2017 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 2 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY NO. 2:16-CV-02972-KJM-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?