Bisel v. Fisher et al
Filing
5
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:16-cv-2976 DB) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0013 SKO) signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/3/17. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY EUGENE BISEL,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-2976 DB P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
RAY FISHER, JR.,
15
Respondents.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and a motion for stay and abeyance. In his application,
19
petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Fresno County Superior Court. Fresno County is
20
part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
21
California. See Local Rule 120(d).
22
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
23
division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the
24
court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court
25
will not rule on petitioner’s motion for a stay.
26
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
28
This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of California sitting in Fresno; and
1
1
2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
2
filed at:
3
4
5
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
Dated: January 3, 2017
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DLB:9
DLB:1/prisoner-habeas/bise2976.109
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?