Bisel v. Fisher et al

Filing 5

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:16-cv-2976 DB) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0013 SKO) signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/3/17. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-2976 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER RAY FISHER, JR., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and a motion for stay and abeyance. In his application, 19 petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Fresno County Superior Court. Fresno County is 20 part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 21 California. See Local Rule 120(d). 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 23 division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the 24 court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court 25 will not rule on petitioner’s motion for a stay. 26 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 1 1 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be 2 filed at: 3 4 5 United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 Dated: January 3, 2017 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DLB:9 DLB:1/prisoner-habeas/bise2976.109 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?