Cal-Pac Rancho Cordova, LLC et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 20 Motion to modify the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/17/17: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum is Support due 45 days after the Court decides Plaintiffs& #039; Motion to Supplement. Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Combined Memorandum in Support and in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion due 45 days later. Plaintiff's Reply in Support of their Motion and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion due 30 days later. - Defendants' Reply on their Motion due 30 days later. Hearing on Cross Motions 45 days after completion of briefing. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5

SLOTE, LINKS & BOREMAN, LLP
Robert D. Links (SBN 61914) ([e-mail])
Adam G. Slote, Esq. (SBN 137465 ) ([e-mail])
Marglyn E. Paseka (SBN 276054) ([e-mail])
1 Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10
11
12

CAL-PAC RANCHO CORDOVA, LLC, dba
PARKWEST CORDOVA CASINO;
CAPITOL CASINO, INC.; LODI
CARDROOM, INC. dba PARKWEST
CASINO LODI; and ROGELIO’ S, INC.,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16
17

vs.

No. 2:16-CV-02982-TLN-AC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY
THE AMENDED PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING ORDER
Modified From Submitted Version

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE
INTERIOR; RYAN ZINKE, in his official
capacity as Secretary of the Interior; and
MIKE BLACK in his official capacity as
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior –
Indian Affairs,

18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24

After considering plaintiffs’ unopposed motion to modify the Amended Pretrial
Scheduling Order,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY THE AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1

1

Plaintiffs’ motion to modify the Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order is GRANTED.

2

The briefing schedule for the Motion to Supplement the Record is modified as follows:

3

-

Notice of Motion and Motion to Supplement the Record due August 24, 2017

4

-

Opposition to Motion to Supplement due September 28, 2017 (35 days later)

5

-

Reply Brief due October 12, 2017 (14 days later)

6

-

Hearing on the Motion to Supplement is set for October 19, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.

7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

8

The schedule for the Cross Motions for Summary Judgment will be as follows:

9

-

days after the Court decides Plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement;

10
11

-

Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Combined Memorandum in
Support and in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion – due 45 days later;

12
13

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum is Support – due 45

-

Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of their Motion and Opposition to Defendants’ CrossMotion – due 30 days later;

14
15

-

Defendants’ Reply on their Motion – due 30 days later;

16

-

Hearing on Cross Motions – 45 days after completion of briefing.

17

Dated: August 17, 2017

18
19
20

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY THE AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
2