Lakes v. Bath & Body Works, LLC

Filing 187

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/6/2020 ORDERING 178 that the Hearing on the Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery is CONTINUED to 11/12/2020 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Senior Judge Morrison C. England Jr. All filing dates are to be calculated pursuant to that continued date. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906 2 3 4 5 6 jvucinich@clappmoroney.com ELIZABETH D. RHODES, ESQ. BAR#: 218480 erhodes@clappmoroney.com CLAPP, MORONEY, VUCINICH, BEEMAN and SCHELEY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300 San Bruno, CA 94066 (650) 989-5400 (650) 989-5499 FAX 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC 9 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CRYSTAL LAKES, an individual, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 vs. 16 BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 17 18 Defendants. Case No. 2:16-cv-02989-MCE-AC JOINT MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO EXTEND TIME FOR HEARING AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY [ECF NO. 178]; ORDER THEREON [Civil L. R. 7-11] 19 Complaint filed: 10/04/2014 20 Trial date: N/A 21 22 Plaintiff CRYSTAL LAKES’ PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 23 CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY [ECF No. 178] is currently pending for hearing on 24 October 15, 2020, so that opposition is due no later than October 1, 2020. As of 25 September 22, 2020, moving defendant BATH & BODY WORKS has substituted in new 26 counsel, Jeffrey M. Vucinich and Elizabeth D. Rhodes, to take over the defense of this 27 matter.[ECF No. 179] Mr. Vucinich and Ms. Rhodes have conferred with plaintiff’s 28 counsel Daniel L. Stanner, Esq., and Mr. Stanner has graciously agreed to allow a 30 day 1 JOINT MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO EXTEND TIME FOR HEARING AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY [ECF NO. 178] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION; STIPULATION; ORDER THEREON 1 continuance if this Court will permit the extension. Good cause exists to co ntinue the 2 hearing as new counsel has had no time to review the contents of the motion that is 3 pending, and time is needed to review the voluminous file in this matter. The signing of 4 this motion sets forth the parties’ agreement and stipulation to this 3 0-day continuance. 5 Administrative relief is therefore respectfully requested, in the form of a continuance of the 6 motion date from October 15, 2020, to a date 30 days forward, within this Court’s 7 discretion, or on November 12, 2020. 8 Respectfully submitted, 9 10 Dated: September 25, 2020 11 CLAPP, MORONEY, VUCINICH, BEEMAN and SCHELEY 12 By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Vucinich JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. ELIZABETH D. RHODES, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: September 25, 2020 TABET DIVITO & ROTHSTEIN, LLC 18 19 20 21 By: /s/ Daniel L. Stanner DANIEL L. STANNER, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff, CRYSTAL LAKES 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO EXTEND TIME FOR HEARING AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY [ECF NO. 178] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION; STIPULATION; ORDER THEREON 1 2 ORDER In accordance with the foregoing stipulated motion, and good cause appearing, IT 3 IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the hearing on plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Conduct 4 Limited Discovery [ECF No. 178] is continued to November 12, 2020, at 2:00 p.m.., in 5 Courtroom 7. All filing dates are to be calculated pursuant to that continued date. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: October 6, 2020 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO EXTEND TIME FOR HEARING AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY [ECF NO. 178] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION; STIPULATION; ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?