Lakes v. Bath & Body Works, LLC

Filing 246

ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 3/28/24 ORDERING that pursuant to 245 the parties' Stipulation, the parties shall be permitted to present to the jury (1) the pre-recorded video testimony of Robert Harrington and Norman Panting at trial, and (2) the videotaped deposition testimony identified in the Joint Pretrial Statement, subject to the Court resolving any proper objections. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DANIEL L. STANNER Admitted Pro Hac Vice TABET DIVITO & ROTHSTEIN LLC 209 S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor Chicago, IL 60604 Telephone: (312) 762-9450 Facsimile: (312) 762-9451 Email: dstanner@tdrlawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, CRYSTAL LAKES JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ., BAR#: 67906 jvucinich@clappmoroney.com KRISTOPHER D.R. DOODHA, ESQ., BAR#: 339601 kdoodha@clappmoroney.com CLAPP, MORONEY, VUCINICH, BEEMAN and SCHELEY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1730 S. El Camino Real, Suite 500 San Mateo, CA 94402 Tel: (650) 989-5400 Fax: (650) 989-5499 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 CRYSTAL LAKES, an individual, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 NO. 2:16-cv-02989-DJC-AC v. BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 17 ORDER CONCERNING WITNESS TESTIMONY VIA VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OR VIA LIVE VIDEOCONFERENCE Defendant. 18 19 Good cause appearing therefore, pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, the parties 20 shall be permitted to present to the jury (1) the pre-recorded video testimony of Robert 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Harrington and Norman Panting at trial, and (2) the videotaped deposition testimony identified in the Joint Pretrial Statement, subject to the Court resolving any proper objections. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 28, 2024 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?