Williams v. Riley et al
Filing
33
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/8/2018 ADOPTING 27 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 22 Motion for Judicial Intervention. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-CV-3002-JAM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
RILEY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
On August 21, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations
23
have been filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed August 21, 2018, are adopted in
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for judicial intervention (Doc. 22) is denied.
3
4
full; and
5
6
7
8
DATED: November 8, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?