Barker v. Osemwingie et al
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2017 (ECF No. 42 ), are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 9 ) is DENIE D; Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32 ) is GRANTED; Counts One through Five and the portion of Count Six alleging defendant Ramiscal abandoned plaintiff are DISMISSED without leave to amend. The portion of Count Six related to the claim that defendants Osemwingie and Ramiscal misused the hoyer lift is DISMISSED with LEAVE TO AMEND; Plaintiff has thirty days from the filing of this order to file an amended complaint. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM BARKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-3008 JAM CKD P
v.
ORDER
OSEMWINGIE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an action pursuant to Titles II
18
and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12132, 12203; Section 504 of
19
the Rehabilitation Act (RA) of 1973; California’s Disabled Persons Act (DPA), Cal. Civ. Code §§
20
54.1, 54.3; the Unruh Civil Rights Act (URCA), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51, 52; and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
21
(ECF No. 8-1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
22
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 11, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
23
24
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
25
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 42.) Plaintiff
26
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 43) and defendants have
27
responded to the objections (ECF No. 44).
28
////
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
2
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
3
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
4
analysis.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2017 (ECF No. 42), are adopted in
7
full.
8
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 9) is denied.
9
3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) is granted.
10
4. Counts One through Five and the portion of Count Six alleging defendant Ramiscal
11
abandoned plaintiff are dismissed without leave to amend. The portion of Count Six related to
12
the claim that defendants Osemwingie and Ramiscal misused the hoyer lift is dismissed with
13
leave to amend.
14
15
16
5. Plaintiff has thirty days from the filing of this order to file an amended complaint.
DATED: 12/19/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?