Barker v. Osemwingie et al

Filing 62

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/2019 and signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/24/2019 ORDERING Clerk of Court to reassign this case to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney with all documents hereafter filed to bear case No. 2:16-cv-3008 CKD and VACATING all currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Mendez. (cc: JAM) (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM BARKER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-3008 JAM CKD P v. ORDER OSEMWINGIE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a “Consent to Proceed Before a 17 18 United States Magistrate Judge.” (ECF Nos. 39, 60.) According to Local Rule 305, both the 19 district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to 20 the magistrate judge. The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned 21 22 case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of 23 final judgment. 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable 25 Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall please take note that all documents hereafter filed with the 26 Clerk of the Court shall bear case No. 2:16-cv-3008 CKD. All currently scheduled dates 27 presently set before Judge Mendez are hereby VACATED. 28 ///// 1 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 DATED: April 11, 2019 3 /s/ John A. Mendez______________ 4 John A. Mendez 5 United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings 10 and entry of final judgment. 11 Dated: April 24, 2019 12 13 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?