Barker v. Osemwingie et al
Filing
62
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/11/2019 and signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/24/2019 ORDERING Clerk of Court to reassign this case to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney with all documents hereafter filed to bear case No. 2:16-cv-3008 CKD and VACATING all currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Mendez. (cc: JAM) (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM BARKER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-3008 JAM CKD P
v.
ORDER
OSEMWINGIE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a “Consent to Proceed Before a
17
18
United States Magistrate Judge.” (ECF Nos. 39, 60.) According to Local Rule 305, both the
19
district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to
20
the magistrate judge.
The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned
21
22
case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of
23
final judgment.
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable
25
Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall please take note that all documents hereafter filed with the
26
Clerk of the Court shall bear case No. 2:16-cv-3008 CKD. All currently scheduled dates
27
presently set before Judge Mendez are hereby VACATED.
28
/////
1
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
DATED: April 11, 2019
3
/s/ John A. Mendez______________
4
John A. Mendez
5
United States District Court Judge
6
7
8
9
Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings
10
and entry of final judgment.
11
Dated: April 24, 2019
12
13
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?