Fernandez v. Warden

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/24/2017 GRANTING 16 Motion for an Extension of Time. Petitioner shall have an additional 60 days, up to 12/26/2017, to file a response to respondents motion to dismiss. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORY WALLACE FERNANDEZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-3013 MCE AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER SOLEDAD STATE PRISON, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner has requested a sixty-day extension of time to file and serve an opposition to 18 respondent’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 16. A response is currently due by October 27, 2017. 19 Petitioner also states that in screening the complaint, the court failed to understand that petitioner 20 was seeking a stay and abeyance so that he could return to state court to exhaust his unexhausted 21 claims. Id. at 2. If petitioner seeks to stay his case while he returns to state court, he must file a 22 separate motion for a stay. The motion must specify whether he is seeking a stay under Rhines v. 23 Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005), or Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003). 24 A Rhines stay is available for (1) a petition containing only unexhausted claims, or (2) a 25 petition that is “mixed” (contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims). See Rhines, supra; 26 see also Mena v. Long, 813 F.3d 907, 910 (9th Cir. 2016). A Rhines stay preserves the federal 27 filing date for unexhausted claims contained in the federal petition. In order to obtain a stay 28 under Rhines, the petitioner must show that (1) good cause exists for her failure to have first 1 exhausted the claims in state court, (2) the claim or claims at issue potentially have merit, and (3) 2 petitioner has not intentionally delayed pursuing the litigation. Rhines, at 544 U.S. at 277-78. 3 Alternatively, a petitioner may seek to stay an exhausted-claims-only petition pursuant to 4 Kelly. See King v. Ryan, 564 F.3d 1133, 1135 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing three-step procedure of 5 Kelly). Under the Kelly procedure, the court may stay a petition containing only exhausted 6 claims while allowing the petitioner to proceed to state court to exhaust additional claims. Id. 7 (citing Kelly, 315 F.3d at 1070-71). The procedure under Kelly is as follows: “(1) a petitioner 8 amends his petition to delete any unexhausted claims; (2) the court stays and holds in abeyance 9 the amended, fully exhausted petition, allowing the petitioner the opportunity to proceed to state 10 court to exhaust the deleted claims; and (3) the petitioner later amends his [federal] petition” to 11 reincorporate the newly exhausted claims. Id. The Kelly stay-and-abeyance procedure does not 12 require petitioner to demonstrate good cause or that the claims have merit. However, using the 13 Kelly procedure means that any newly-exhausted claims later added to the federal petition by 14 amendment must “relate back” to the claims in the stayed petition or otherwise satisfy applicable 15 timeliness requirements. In other words, “the Kelly procedure, unlike the Rhines procedure, does 16 nothing to protect a petitioner’s unexhausted claims from untimeliness in the interim.” Id. at 17 1141. 18 In light of respondent’s motion to dismiss, which is based in part on the ground that the 19 petition is untimely, any motion for stay, whether brought under Rhines or Kelly, will need to 20 explain why the claims petitioner seeks to exhaust would not be barred as untimely. Petitioner is 21 advised that he does not require and should not wait for an order from this court to exhaust his 22 claims in state court, and he may pursue them in state court without delay. 23 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 16) is granted; and 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 2 1 2 3 4 2. Petitioner shall have an additional sixty day, up to December 26, 2017, to file a response to respondent’s motion to dismiss. SO ORDERED. DATED: October 24, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?