Hill v. Kernan et al

Filing 30

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/20/2018 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KENNETH HILL,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-3020 KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed June 22, 2018, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the

18

court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants Cottrell

19

and Murphy. On August 15, 2018, plaintiff was granted an additional 21 days in which to submit

20

the necessary documents. That period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any

21

way to the court’s order.

22
23
24
25
26

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1

1

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and

2

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

3

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

4

Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: September 20, 2018

6
7
/hill3020.fusm

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2