Hill v. Kernan et al
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/19/2018 GRANTING Plaintiff 21 days in which to comply with 19 and 29 Orders. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KENNETH HILL,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-3020 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff filed objections to the pending
18
findings and recommendations, and in his second objection, plaintiff claims he was not served
19
with the findings and recommendations until September 12, 2018. In addition, due to a
20
lockdown, as well as having two other court deadlines, plaintiff states he was unable to “respond,
21
object, or comply with the” August 15, 2018 order requiring plaintiff to provide the documents
22
for service of process. Plaintiff did not provide the service of process documents with his
23
objections.
24
The court notes that plaintiff did not seek an extension of time in which to comply with
25
the order. Thus, it is unclear whether plaintiff intends to comply with the order since he was first
26
ordered to provide the documents for service of process by order filed June 22, 2018. But,
27
because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, plaintiff will be granted one final opportunity to provide
28
the documents for service of process. If plaintiff fails to timely provide such documents, the
1
1
undersigned will forward the findings and recommendations and plaintiff’s objections to the
2
district court for review.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted twenty-one days in
4
which to comply with the June 22, 2018 and August 15, 2018 orders. Failure to timely respond
5
will result in the dismissal of this action.
6
Dated: October 19, 2018
7
8
/hill3020.eot
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?