Robben v. Wagoner et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/3/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 11 ) is DENIED.(Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

TODD ROBBEN,

11
12

No. 2:16-cv-3022 JAM CKD P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

13

JAMES R. WAGONER, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

On April 7, 2017, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for

17

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s orders dated March 17, 2017. Pursuant to E.D. Local

18

Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to

19

law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate

20

judge’s rulings are clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF
No. 11) is denied.

23
24

Dated: May 3, 2017

25
26
27
28

robb3022.851

/s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE