Robben v. Wagoner et al
Filing
33
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/26/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TODD ROBBEN,
12
No. 2:16-cv-3022 JAM CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
14
JAMES R. WAGONER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On May 18, 2018 plaintiff was granted thirty days within which to file an amended
17
18
complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal. The thirty-day
19
period has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
20
21
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
22
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
23
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after
24
being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with
25
the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
26
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.
2
1991).
3
Dated: June 26, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
robb3022.fta
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?