Dalton v. Adams

Filing 14

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/1/17: Petitioner shall show cause within fifteen days of the date of this Order why his failure to obey this court's Rule should not result in the granting of the Motion to Dismiss now on file. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JENNIFER DALTON, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-3042 KJM GGH v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DARRELL ADAMS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 On March 28, 2017, Respondent filed and served a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for 18 Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 10, filed by petitioner on December 29, 2016. ECF No. 1. 19 Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(l) requires that: 20 Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed by the responding party not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion. A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in question. Failure of the responding party to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of an opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions. (Emphasis added.) 21 22 23 24 25 Petitioner shall have 15 days from the date of this Order to show cause why Respondent’s Motion 26 to Dismiss should not be granted for lack of opposition. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Petitioner shall show cause 2 within fifteen days of the date of this Order why his failure to obey this court’s Rule should not 3 result in the granting of the Motion to Dismiss now on file. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 1, 2017 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?