United States v. Salcedo

Filing 9

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/10/2016 2 Related Case(s) 2:16-MC-43 MCE AC with 2:11-CR-353 MCE; the parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the action is effected. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:16-MC-00043-MCE-AC
No. 2:11-CR-00353 MCE
RELATED CASE ORDER

ANTHONY SALCEDO,

15

Defendant.

16
The Court received the Notice of Related Case filed on March 4, 2016 (ECF No.

17
18

255).
Examination of the above-entitled civil and criminal actions reveals that these

19
20

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The

21

actions involve the same defendant and are based on the same or similar claims, the

22

same property transactions or events, similar questions of fact and the same questions

23

of law, and would therefore entail a substantial duplication of labor if heard by different

24

judges.
Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a

25
26

substantial savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

27

///

28

///
1

1

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely

2

has the result that both actions are assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the

3

action is effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally

4

assigned to the district judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was

5

assigned.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 10, 2016

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2