United States of America v. Approximately $51,498.00 in U.S. Currency et al

Filing 2

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/5/16 ORDERING examination of the above-entitled cases reveals they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123. Therefore, action 2:16-MC-00120-TLN-AC is reassigned to th e undersigned district judge. Henceforth the caption for future filings on the reassigned case shall show the initials "GEB-AC". The Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases as a result of this reassignment. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 9 10 11 12 No. 2:16-MC-00120-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. RELATED CASE ORDER APPROXIMATELY $51,498.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, and MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION, 13 Defendants. 14 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 17 18 No. 2:16-CR-00037-GEB Plaintiff, v. THOMAS CHADD, Defendant. 19 20 On June 27, 2016, the United States of America filed a 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 “Notice of Related Cases” in which it states: “the civil forfeiture action and the criminal action arise from the same law enforcement investigation and, therefore, involve substantially the same events, transactions, and parties.” (ECF No. 33.) Examination of the above-entitled cases reveals they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123. Under the regular practice of this court, a later filed related case is 1 1 generally assigned to the judge to whom the first filed case is 2 assigned. Therefore, action 2:16-MC-00120-TLN-AC is reassigned to 3 the undersigned district judge. Henceforth the caption for future 4 filings on the reassigned case shall show the initials “GEB-AC”. 5 The 6 adjustment in 7 Dated: the of the assignment Court reassignment. 8 Clerk of July 5, 2016 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 shall cases as make a appropriate result of this

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?