Kriegman v. McKean

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/18/2016 AUTHORIZING and APPOINTING Ace Attorney Service, Inc. to serve the writs in this matter; ORDERING that the U.S. Marshal's office remain the Levying Officer. (cc: U.S. Marshal) (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Margaret E. Garms, State Bar No. 84938 Donna T. Parkinson, State Bar No. 125574 PARKINSON PHINNEY 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2560 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 449-1444 Facsimile: (916) 449-1440 E-mail: donna@parkinsonphinney.com 5 Counsel for Plaintiff, Bruce P. Kriegman 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 9 10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BRUCE P. KRIEGMAN, Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 WARREN McKEAN, 14 Defendant 15 18 19 REQUEST AND ORDER FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS BY REGISTERED PROCESS SERVER [Rule 4(c), Fed. R. Civ. P.] [No hearing required] Plaintiff, Bruce P. Kriegman, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules 16 17 Case No. 2:16-mc-00136-WBS-CKD of Civil Procedure, requests that any registered process server employed by Ace Attorney Service, Inc. – all of whom are at least 18 years of age, of suitable discretion and not party to the within action – be authorized and appointed to serve the writs in the above case. The U.S. Marshal’s Office will remain the Levying Officer. 20 Respectfully submitted, 21 22 Dated: August 16, 2016 PARKINSON PHINNEY 23 24 25 By: _______________________________ Margaret E. Garms, Counsel for Plaintiff, Bruce P. Kriegman 26 27 28 ///// ///// ///// {288/00001/MG/A0327974.DOC} 1 Request and Order for Service of Process by Registered Process Server 1 2 SO ORDERED: Dated: August 18, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {288/00001/MG/A0327974.DOC} 2 Request and Order for Service of Process by Registered Process Server

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?