Kriegman v. McKean
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/18/2016 AUTHORIZING and APPOINTING Ace Attorney Service, Inc. to serve the writs in this matter; ORDERING that the U.S. Marshal's office remain the Levying Officer. (cc: U.S. Marshal) (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
Margaret E. Garms, State Bar No. 84938
Donna T. Parkinson, State Bar No. 125574
PARKINSON PHINNEY
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2560
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone:
(916) 449-1444
Facsimile:
(916) 449-1440
E-mail: donna@parkinsonphinney.com
5
Counsel for Plaintiff, Bruce P. Kriegman
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
9
10
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
BRUCE P. KRIEGMAN,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
WARREN McKEAN,
14
Defendant
15
18
19
REQUEST AND ORDER FOR SERVICE
OF PROCESS BY REGISTERED
PROCESS SERVER
[Rule 4(c), Fed. R. Civ. P.]
[No hearing required]
Plaintiff, Bruce P. Kriegman, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules
16
17
Case No. 2:16-mc-00136-WBS-CKD
of Civil Procedure, requests that any registered process server employed by Ace Attorney Service,
Inc. – all of whom are at least 18 years of age, of suitable discretion and not party to the within
action – be authorized and appointed to serve the writs in the above case. The U.S. Marshal’s
Office will remain the Levying Officer.
20
Respectfully submitted,
21
22
Dated: August 16, 2016
PARKINSON PHINNEY
23
24
25
By:
_______________________________
Margaret E. Garms, Counsel for
Plaintiff, Bruce P. Kriegman
26
27
28
/////
/////
/////
{288/00001/MG/A0327974.DOC}
1
Request and Order for Service of Process
by Registered Process Server
1
2
SO ORDERED:
Dated: August 18, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{288/00001/MG/A0327974.DOC}
2
Request and Order for Service of Process
by Registered Process Server
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?