Halloum v. Kasolas et al
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/29/16 ORDERING the 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED without prejudice; Clerk to send appellant blank IFP form. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
In re:
12
YOUSIF H. HALLOUM,
13
Debtor.
14
15
YOUSIF H. HALLOUM,
18
Bk. No.
12-21477-C-7
Appellant,
16
17
BAP Nos. EC-16-1158
EC-16-1159
EC-16-1162
EC-16-1163
EC-16-1164
EC-16-1164
Dist. Ct. No. 2:16-mc-0153 WBS AC (PS)
v.
MICHAEL G. KASOLAS, chapter 7
trustee; et al.,
19
ORDER
Appellants.
20
21
The U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit has referred the in forma
22
pauperis (“IFP”) application of pro se appellant Yousif H. Halloum to the district court for
23
resolution. ECF No. 1 at 1-2. The court is unable to approve the application (ECF No. 2) in its
24
current form, because it does not contain the affidavit (or declaration) required by 28 U.S.C.
25
§ 1915(a)(1).
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. The IFP application (ECF No. 2), is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal in
28
1
1
2
compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); and
2. The Clerk of the District Court is directed to send appellant the blank IFP form used in
3
district court cases.
4
DATED: September 29, 2016
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?