CDK Global, LLC al v. Tulley Automotive Group, Inc.
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/10/2017 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant's 1 Motion to Compel. (Jackson, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CDK GLOBAL, LLC,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-mc-0191 MCE CKD
v.
ORDER
TULLEY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
Defendant has filed a motion to compel compliance with a subpoena duces tecum served
17
18
on non-party Performance Chevrolet. The subpoena was issued in June, 2016 by the United
19
States District Court for the District of New Jersey and production was called for in New York.
20
ECF No. 1-5. As such the instant motion to compel should have been brought in the federal court
21
venued in New York. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(2)(B)(i). In addition, it appears defendant’s motion
22
to compel is untimely under the scheduling order issued in the New Jersey action. ECF No. 4-4
23
at p. 3 (fact discovery to be completed by August 31, 2016). Moreover, objections have been
24
filed by an interested party and it appears that defendant has not properly met and conferred with
25
the objecting party.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 1)
2
is denied without prejudice.
3
Dated: January 10, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
4 cdkglobal191.subp
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?