Trotter v. Felix et al.
Filing
12
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/10/20 ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's second amended complaint 8 is dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk is directed to close the case. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH TROTTER,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:17-cv-14-JAM-EFB PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MARIC FELIX; NELSON FELIX; JOHN
FLANAGAN; and FUSION PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT COMPANY,
Defendants.
17
18
On July 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
19
were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
20
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on July 24,
21
2020, and they were considered by the undersigned.
22
This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which
23
objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore
24
Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As
25
to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court
26
assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. United
27
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
28
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
1
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
2
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
3
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
4
1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 6, 2020, are ADOPTED;
5
2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 8) is dismissed without leave to
6
7
amend; and
3. The Clerk is directed to close the case.
8
9
10
11
DATED: August 10, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?