Candler v. Prather et al
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/07/19 GRANTING Defendant Romney's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; Plaintiff's claims against him are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Romney terminated. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEITH CANDLER,
12
No. 2:17-cv-23-JAM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
PRATHER, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) inmate
17
18
proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was
19
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
20
302.
21
On August 8, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
22
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
23
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
24
objections to the findings and recommendations and defendants have file a response thereto.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
27
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
28
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 8, 2019, are adopted in full;
3
2. Defendant Romney’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED;
4
5
6
7
and
3. Plaintiff’s claims against him are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies.
So ordered.
8
9
10
11
DATED: October 7, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?