Lee v. California Correctional Center et al
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2018 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
OSCAR CLAYBORNE LEE,
5
6
7
8
No. 2:17-cv-0024-JAM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL
CENTER, et al.,
Defendants.
9
10
11
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
12
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
13
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
14
On March 9, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
15
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
16
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
17
the findings and recommendations.
18
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
19
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED that:
21
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2018, are adopted in full; and
22
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to
23
prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E. D. Cal. Local Rule 110; 28 U.S.C. 1915A.
24
25
26
DATED: April 26, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?