Lee v. California Correctional Center et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2018 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 OSCAR CLAYBORNE LEE, 5 6 7 8 No. 2:17-cv-0024-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. 9 10 11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 12 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 13 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 14 On March 9, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 15 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 16 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 17 the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2018, are adopted in full; and 22 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to 23 prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E. D. Cal. Local Rule 110; 28 U.S.C. 1915A. 24 25 26 DATED: April 26, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?