Reddy v. ACS Associated, Inc. et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/13/2017 REMANDING this matter to the Superior Court of California for the County of Sacramento; ORDERING the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees regarding the removal and remand. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LAWYERS FOR WORKPLACE FAIRNESS APC Scott Houtz (SBN 180061) 4100 West Alameda Avenue, Third Floor Burbank, California 91505 Telephone: (323) 375-5101 Attorney for Plaintiff NAITHAN REDDY LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Robert G. Hulteng (SBN 071293) Kelsey E. Papst (SBN 270547) 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 830-7200 Attorneys for Defendant ACS ASSOCIATED, INC. 9 10 11 12 13 14 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. Dale R. Kuykendall (SBN 148833) Nicholas D. Poper (SBN 293900) 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 341-0404 Attorneys for Defendant PREMIUM OF TENNESSEE, INC. (erroneously sued as Premium Transportation Staffing, Inc.) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 17 18 NAITHAN REDDY, Case No.: 2:17-CV-00045-WBS-GGH 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 24 25 vs. ACS ASSOCIATED, INC., a Corporation; PREMIUM TRANSPORTATION STAFFING, INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, ORDER ON THE STIPULATION REGARDING AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY AND REMAND TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb Dept.: Courtroom 5 Defendants. 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 The Court, having considered the Parties’ Stipulation Regarding Amount in 2 Controversy and Remand to the Sacramento County Superior Court, and with good cause 3 appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 4 Based on the Stipulation Regarding Amount in Controversy and Remand to the 5 Sacramento County Superior Court of the Parties that the amount in controversy, inclusive of 6 any and all attorneys’ fees and costs through the conclusion of the trial in this action, does not 7 exceed $75,000, in that Plaintiff stipulates and agrees he cannot recover any amount, whether 8 damages, restitution, disgorgement, penalties, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, costs, and 9 other relief of any kind whatsoever, through the conclusion of a trial in this action, in excess 10 of $75,000, this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Superior Court of California for the 11 County of Sacramento. The Parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees regarding 12 the removal and remand. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 13, 2017 15 16 17 18 19 4815-2126-9570, v. 2 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?