Cooks v. California State Prison et al.

Filing 21

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/04/17 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES R. COOKS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-0049 JAM CKD P

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON,
SOLANO, et al.,
Defendants.

16

On October 23, 2017, plaintiff’s amended complaint was stricken and thirty days leave to

17
18

file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and

19

plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

20
21

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after

24

being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with

25

the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

26

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

27

////

28

/////
1

1

waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

2

1991).

3

Dated: December 4, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

1
cook0049.fta

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2