Valentine v Social Security Administration

Filing 4

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/8/17: Plaintiff show cause in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Hearing as to 3 Motion to Dismiss continued to 3/17/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. On or before 3/3/17, plaintiff shall file a statement of opposition or non-opposition to motion to dismiss. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DESHAYLA VALENTINE, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:17-cv-0051 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 On January 17, 2017, defendant filed a motion to dismiss and noticed that motion for 21 hearing before the undersigned on February 17, 2017. (ECF No. 3.) Pursuant to Local Rule 22 230(c) plaintiff was to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion 23 “not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” Plaintiff, however, has 24 failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. 25 The failure of a party to comply with the Local Rules or any order of the court “may be 26 grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or 27 within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. Any individual representing himself or 28 herself without an attorney is bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules, and 1 1 all applicable law. Local Rule 183(a). Failure to comply with applicable rules and law may be 2 grounds for dismissal or any other sanction appropriate under the Local Rules. Id. In light of plaintiff’s pro se status, and in the interests of justice, the court will provide 3 4 plaintiff with an opportunity to show good cause for her conduct along with a final opportunity to 5 oppose defendant’s motion. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. Plaintiff show cause in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order as to why 8 this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution1; 9 2. The February 17, 2017 hearing of defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 3) is 10 continued to Friday, March 17, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I 11 Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned; 12 13 3. On or before March 3, 2017, plaintiff shall file a statement of opposition or nonopposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss; and 14 4. Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to timely comply with this order may result in a 15 recommendation that this case be dismissed. 16 Dated: February 8, 2017 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:6 DB\orders\ se\valentine0051.osc 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this civil action plaintiff may comply with this order by filing a request for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?