Bell v. Martel et al
Filing
76
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/08/19 ORDERING plaintiff shall show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failing to comply with a court order requiring his participation at the August 1, 2019 settlement conference. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL XAVIER BELL,
12
No. 2:17-cv-0063-MCE-CKD-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
MICHAEL MARTEL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On June 20, 2019, the court set this case for a settlement conference on August 1,
19
2019 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. ECF No. 68. In order to secure plaintiff’s
20
presence at the settlement conference, the court issued two separate writs of habeas corpus ad
21
testificandum because plaintiff is currently in the custody of the Men’s Central Jail in Los
22
Angeles County. See ECF Nos. 70-71. These writs were the fourth and fifth court orders for
23
plaintiff’s transportation that were issued in this case in an effort to expeditiously resolve this
24
matter via a settlement conference. See ECF Nos. 54, 55, 64.1 While the transportation details
25
were not disclosed to plaintiff for security purposes, the court included specific provisions in
26
27
28
To emphasize the amount of court resources that have been dedicated to securing plaintiff’s
transportation to the settlement conference, the court notes that one of these writs was issued
during the federal government shutdown.
1
1
1
these writs in order to minimize any disruption to plaintiff’s physical and mental health care as
2
well as any participation in programming.2
3
On August 1, 2019, plaintiff failed to appear at the scheduled settlement conference in
4
violation of a court order. ECF No. 75. The court did receive a message on that date from an
5
individual who identified herself as a member of plaintiff’s family indicating that there was a
6
“misunderstanding in his transfer.” The court will give plaintiff the opportunity to provide the
7
court with any information regarding his failure to attend the settlement conference.
8
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
9
1.
Plaintiff shall show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed
10
pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failing to comply
11
with a court order requiring his participation at the August 1, 2019 settlement
12
conference.
13
2. Plaintiff is advised that his failure to respond to this court order will result in a
14
15
recommendation that this case be dismissed for failing to prosecute.
Dated: August 8, 2019
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
12/bell0063.osc.docx
24
25
26
27
28
2
Additionally, a review of the docket in this case reveals that even when plaintiff was afforded
the opportunity to choose whether he would appear at the settlement conference in person or by
video conference, plaintiff failed to respond. See ECF No. 53 at 1 (indicating that “[p]laintiff will
be required to return the attached form advising the court how he would like to appear at the
settlement conference so that the court may issue the appropriate orders.”
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?