Dunlap v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/3/17, ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
GREGORY A. THYBERG SBN102132
THYBERGLAW
3104 O Street #190
Sacramento, California 95816
Telephone: (916) 204-9173
Attorneys For Plaintiff, STEWART DUNLAP
DAMIEN P. LILLIS SBN 191258
LILLIS PITHA LLP
350 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 814-0405
Attorneys For Defendant, MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTICT COURT
11
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
STEWART DUNLAP,
Plaintiff,
v.
17
18
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., a
corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive,
19
20
Defendants.
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00064-JAM-AC
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE;
ORDER THEREON
F. R. CIV. PRO. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii)
22
23
Plaintiff, STEWART DUNLAP and defendant, MICRON
24
TECHNOLOGY, INC. by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the
25
following stipulation:
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00064-JAM-AC
1
1
2
3
Pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this
action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The parties each shall bear their
respective costs and attorney’s fees.
4
5
DATED: August 1, 2017
THYBERG LAW
6
/S/GREGORY A. THYBERG
Gregory Thyberg
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STEWART DUNLAP
7
8
9
10
DATED: August 1, 2017
11
LITHA PITHA, LLP
/S/ DAMIEN LILLIS
Damien Lillis
Attorneys for Defendant
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
DATED: 8/3/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez______________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PROPOSED ORDER THEREON
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00064-JAM-AC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?