Dunlap v. Micron Technology, Inc.

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/3/17, ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GREGORY A. THYBERG SBN102132 THYBERGLAW 3104 O Street #190 Sacramento, California 95816 Telephone: (916) 204-9173 Attorneys For Plaintiff, STEWART DUNLAP DAMIEN P. LILLIS SBN 191258 LILLIS PITHA LLP 350 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 814-0405 Attorneys For Defendant, MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTICT COURT 11 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 STEWART DUNLAP, Plaintiff, v. 17 18 MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., a corporation, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 19 20 Defendants. 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:17-cv-00064-JAM-AC STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER THEREON F. R. CIV. PRO. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) 22 23 Plaintiff, STEWART DUNLAP and defendant, MICRON 24 TECHNOLOGY, INC. by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby enter into the 25 following stipulation: 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PROPOSED ORDER THEREON Case No.: 2:17-cv-00064-JAM-AC 1 1 2 3 Pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. The parties each shall bear their respective costs and attorney’s fees. 4 5 DATED: August 1, 2017 THYBERG LAW 6 /S/GREGORY A. THYBERG Gregory Thyberg Attorneys for Plaintiff STEWART DUNLAP 7 8 9 10 DATED: August 1, 2017 11 LITHA PITHA, LLP /S/ DAMIEN LILLIS Damien Lillis Attorneys for Defendant MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 DATED: 8/3/2017 /s/ John A. Mendez______________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PROPOSED ORDER THEREON Case No.: 2:17-cv-00064-JAM-AC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?