Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Burwell

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/24/2017 ORDERING that the deadline for Defendant's response to the Complaint is CONTINUED until after the Court issues a decision on Defendant's 7 Motion for Stay of Proce edings. Defendant shall file his response to the Complaint within 30 days of the date of an order denying Defendants Motion, or within 30 days of the date of an order lifting the requested stay of proceedings, whichever is applicable. (Zignago, K.)

1 Troy A. Schell, Esq. (SBN 208661)
Bryan Wong, Esq. (SBN 205573)
2 3300 East Guasti Road, 3rd Floor
Ontario, California 91761
3 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5 Prime Healthcare Services – Shasta, LLC,
d.b.a Shasta Regional Medical Center
6
7 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
8 PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH
JOSEPH B. FRUEH
9 Assistant United States Attorneys
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
10 Sacramento, CA 95814
E-mail:
[e-mail]
11
[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
13 Attorneys for Defendant
TOM PRICE
14 Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
15
16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES –
SHASTA LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company doing business as Shasta Regional
Medical Center,

21
Plaintiff,
22
v.
23
24

TOM PRICE, in his official capacity as
Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services,

25
Defendant.
26
27
28

30

Case No. 2:17-CV-00072-TLN-KJN
STIPULATION AND TO CONTINUE
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO THE
COMPLAINT

1
2

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services – Shasta,

3 LLC, and Defendant Tom Price, through their undersigned counsel and subject to Court approval, that
4 the deadline for Defendant’s response to the Complaint be continued until after the Court issues a
5 decision on Defendant’s Motion for Stay of Proceedings (ECF No. 7), which is scheduled to be heard on
6 April 20, 2017. Defendant’s response to the Complaint is currently due on April 17, 2017.
7

Specifically, the parties stipulate that, subject to Court approval, Defendant shall file his response

8 to the Complaint within 30 days of the date of an order denying Defendant’s Motion, or within 30 days
9 of the date of an order lifting the requested stay of proceedings, whichever is applicable.
10

Neither trial nor any other date has been scheduled in this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

11 Procedure 16, and the parties have not previously requested a continuance.
12 Dated: March 23, 2017

PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney

13
By:

14
15
16

/s/ Joseph B. Frueh
JOSEPH B. FRUEH
PHILIP A. SCARBOROUGH
Assistant United States Attorneys
Attorneys for Defendant
TOM PRICE
Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services

17
18
19

TROY A. SCHELL, ESQ.
BRYAN WONG, ESQ.

20
21

By:

22

/s/ Bryan Wong
Bryan Wong, Esq.

(authorized on 3/22/2017)

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Prime Healthcare Services – Shasta, LLC

23
24
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 Dated: March 24, 2017
27

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

28

30

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S
RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT

1