Williams v. Passini et al

Filing 3

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/17 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge to this action; and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LANCE WILLIAMS,

12
13
14

No. 2: 17-cv-0076 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

MATILDA PASSINI, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On January 12, 2017, plaintiff filed a notice of removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441.

18

Plaintiff requests that a civil action filed by plaintiff in the Solano County Superior Court be

19

removed to this court.

20

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1441 provides that only defendants may seek removal. Because plaintiff

21

is not authorized to remove this action, the undersigned recommends that this action be

22

dismissed.

23
24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a
district judge to this action; and

25

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1

1

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

2

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

3

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

4

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: January 19, 2017

6
7
8
9
10

Will76.dis

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2