Shephard Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/1/2017 ORDERING that mediation be completed by 1/9/2018. (cc: VDRP) (Michel, G.)
1
2
BRIAN D. BERTOSSA, ESQ. (SBN 138388)
bbertosa@cookbrown.com
3
4
5
STEPHEN R. McCUTCHEON, JR., ESQ. (SBN 191749)
smccutcheon@cookbrown.com
COOK BROWN, LLP
2407 J STREET, SECOND FLOOR
6
7
8
9
10
11
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95816
TELEPHONE NO.: 916-442-3100
FACSIMILE NO.: 916-442-4227
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of SHEPHARD
MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., and SHEPHARD MECHANICAL
CONTRACTORS, INC.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
15
16
17
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and
benefit of SHEPHARD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS,
INC., a California Corporation, and SHEPHARD
MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.,
Case No.: 2:17-CV-00094-KJN
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE
AND JOINTLY ADMINISTER VDRP REFERRALS;
ORDER
18
19
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE
20
21
22
Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN
G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v.
K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx
1
1
Plaintiffs,
2
v.
3
4
5
K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California
Corporation; TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY
COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut Corporation,
6
Defendants.
7
8
K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
9
Counterclaimant,
10
v.
11
12
SHEPHARD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.,
13
Counterdefendant.
14
15
16
17
18
///
///
Plaintiffs the United States of America, for the use and benefit of Shephard Mechanical Contractors,
Inc., and Shephard Mechanical Contractors, Inc., and Defendants K.O.O. Construction, Inc., and Travelers
19
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE
20
21
22
Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN
G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v.
K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx
2
1
Casualty and Surety Company of America, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as
2
follows:
3
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to submit their claims to mediation;
4
WHEREAS the court’s order of June 16, 2017 stayed the action and no discovery has been
5
6
conducted to date nor initial disclosures served;
WHEREAS the parties have held their Rule 271(j) conference with Mr. Justin Tierney, the assigned
VDRP neutral on August 30, 2017;
7
WHEREAS the parties believe informal discovery would facilitate a successful mediation;
8
WHEREAS the parties and VDRP neutral have scheduled a further status conference for early
9
10
11
October, 2017 at which the parties expect to set a date for mediation;
WHEREAS the ordinary scheduling under Rule 271 would require completion of VDRP prior to
October 10, 2017, and is insufficient time for the parties to conduct an informal exchange of documents and
information to facilitate mediation;
12
WHEREAS another action has been filed in this Court against Travelers and K.O.O. Construction, Inc.,
13
14
by DKB, Inc., a subcontractor to Shephard Mechanical Contractors, Inc., for payment for labor and materials
provided to the same construction project, United States of America for the use and benefit of DKB, Inc., v.
Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America; KOO Construction, Inc., No. 2:17-at-00698-TLN-EFB, and
15
on August 18, 2017 Travelers filed a Notice of Related Case as docket no. 19 in this matter;
16
WHEREAS DKB, Inc. and its counsel voluntarily participated in the VDRP status conference with Mr.
17
Tierney;
18
19
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE
20
21
22
Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN
G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v.
K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx
3
1
WHEREAS the parties and DKB, Inc. believe it would be most efficient for the conduct of the VDRP
2
3
4
and the resolution of the claims at issue if both matters were assigned to Mr. Tierney and proceeded in the
same VDRP session, and Mr. Tierney indicated to the parties that he would accept the assignment;
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the
Order of the Court, as follows:
5
1.
6
7
8
The time for completion of mediation is extended to January 9, 2018, which is 180 days
from the date of the assignment to Mr. Tierney;
2.
The parties request that the matter of United States of America for the use and benefit of
DKB, Inc., v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America; KOO Construction, Inc., No. 2:17-at-00698TLN-EFB, be referred to Mr. Tierney as VDRP neutral for a joint session with this matter.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
11
DATED: September 1, 2017
COOK BROWN, LLP
12
By: /s/ Stephen R. McCutcheon, Jr.
13
STEPHEN R. McCUTCHEON, JR.
14
Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES
15
OF AMERICA for the Use and Benefit of
16
SHEPHARD MECHANICAL
CONTRACTORS, INC., and SHEPHARD
17
MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
18
19
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE
20
21
22
Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN
G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v.
K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx
4
1
DATED: September 1, 2017
REYNOLDS MADDUX WOODWARD, LLP
2
By: /s/ Arthur G. Woodward (as auth. on 9/1/17)
3
ARTHUR G. WOODWARD
4
Attorneys for Defendant K.O.O.
5
CONSTRUCTION, INC.
6
7
DATED: September 1, 2017
SALAMIRAD, MORROW, TIMPANE
& DUNN LLP
8
9
By: /s/ Edward R. Stepans
10
(as auth. on 9/1/17)
EDWARD R. STEPANS
Attorneys for Defendant TRAVELERS
11
CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
12
OF AMERICA
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE
20
21
22
Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN
G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v.
K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx
5
1
ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED.
3
Dated: September 5, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE
20
21
22
Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN
G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v.
K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?