Shephard Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/1/2017 ORDERING that mediation be completed by 1/9/2018. (cc: VDRP) (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 BRIAN D. BERTOSSA, ESQ. (SBN 138388) bbertosa@cookbrown.com 3 4 5 STEPHEN R. McCUTCHEON, JR., ESQ. (SBN 191749) smccutcheon@cookbrown.com COOK BROWN, LLP 2407 J STREET, SECOND FLOOR 6 7 8 9 10 11 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95816 TELEPHONE NO.: 916-442-3100 FACSIMILE NO.: 916-442-4227 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of SHEPHARD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., and SHEPHARD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 17 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of SHEPHARD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., a California Corporation, and SHEPHARD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Case No.: 2:17-CV-00094-KJN STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE AND JOINTLY ADMINISTER VDRP REFERRALS; ORDER 18 19 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE 20 21 22 Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v. K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx 1 1 Plaintiffs, 2 v. 3 4 5 K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California Corporation; TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut Corporation, 6 Defendants. 7 8 K.O.O. CONSTRUCTION, INC. 9 Counterclaimant, 10 v. 11 12 SHEPHARD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., 13 Counterdefendant. 14 15 16 17 18 /// /// Plaintiffs the United States of America, for the use and benefit of Shephard Mechanical Contractors, Inc., and Shephard Mechanical Contractors, Inc., and Defendants K.O.O. Construction, Inc., and Travelers 19 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE 20 21 22 Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v. K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx 2 1 Casualty and Surety Company of America, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as 2 follows: 3 WHEREAS the parties have agreed to submit their claims to mediation; 4 WHEREAS the court’s order of June 16, 2017 stayed the action and no discovery has been 5 6 conducted to date nor initial disclosures served; WHEREAS the parties have held their Rule 271(j) conference with Mr. Justin Tierney, the assigned VDRP neutral on August 30, 2017; 7 WHEREAS the parties believe informal discovery would facilitate a successful mediation; 8 WHEREAS the parties and VDRP neutral have scheduled a further status conference for early 9 10 11 October, 2017 at which the parties expect to set a date for mediation; WHEREAS the ordinary scheduling under Rule 271 would require completion of VDRP prior to October 10, 2017, and is insufficient time for the parties to conduct an informal exchange of documents and information to facilitate mediation; 12 WHEREAS another action has been filed in this Court against Travelers and K.O.O. Construction, Inc., 13 14 by DKB, Inc., a subcontractor to Shephard Mechanical Contractors, Inc., for payment for labor and materials provided to the same construction project, United States of America for the use and benefit of DKB, Inc., v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America; KOO Construction, Inc., No. 2:17-at-00698-TLN-EFB, and 15 on August 18, 2017 Travelers filed a Notice of Related Case as docket no. 19 in this matter; 16 WHEREAS DKB, Inc. and its counsel voluntarily participated in the VDRP status conference with Mr. 17 Tierney; 18 19 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE 20 21 22 Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v. K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx 3 1 WHEREAS the parties and DKB, Inc. believe it would be most efficient for the conduct of the VDRP 2 3 4 and the resolution of the claims at issue if both matters were assigned to Mr. Tierney and proceeded in the same VDRP session, and Mr. Tierney indicated to the parties that he would accept the assignment; THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Order of the Court, as follows: 5 1. 6 7 8 The time for completion of mediation is extended to January 9, 2018, which is 180 days from the date of the assignment to Mr. Tierney; 2. The parties request that the matter of United States of America for the use and benefit of DKB, Inc., v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America; KOO Construction, Inc., No. 2:17-at-00698TLN-EFB, be referred to Mr. Tierney as VDRP neutral for a joint session with this matter. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 DATED: September 1, 2017 COOK BROWN, LLP 12 By: /s/ Stephen R. McCutcheon, Jr. 13 STEPHEN R. McCUTCHEON, JR. 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES 15 OF AMERICA for the Use and Benefit of 16 SHEPHARD MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., and SHEPHARD 17 MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. 18 19 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE 20 21 22 Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v. K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx 4 1 DATED: September 1, 2017 REYNOLDS MADDUX WOODWARD, LLP 2 By: /s/ Arthur G. Woodward (as auth. on 9/1/17) 3 ARTHUR G. WOODWARD 4 Attorneys for Defendant K.O.O. 5 CONSTRUCTION, INC. 6 7 DATED: September 1, 2017 SALAMIRAD, MORROW, TIMPANE & DUNN LLP 8 9 By: /s/ Edward R. Stepans 10 (as auth. on 9/1/17) EDWARD R. STEPANS Attorneys for Defendant TRAVELERS 11 CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY 12 OF AMERICA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE 20 21 22 Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v. K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx 5 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED. 3 Dated: September 5, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE VDRP DEADLINE 20 21 22 Case No. 2:17-CV-00094-KJN G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\17.94.Shephard Mechanical v. K.O.O. Construction. Stip to Continue ADR.docx 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?