Ledesma et al v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
12
STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/10/2018. (Hunt, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
CLAUDIA M. QUINTANA
City Attorney, SBN 178613
BY: KELLY J. TRUJILLO
Assistant City Attorney, SBN 244286
CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall
555 Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 3068
Vallejo, CA 94590
Tel: (707) 648-4545
Fax: (707) 648-4687
Email: kelly.trujillo@cityofvallejo.net
Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.
JOHN L. BURRIS ESQ., SBN 69888
ADANTE D. POINTER, SBN 236229
MELISSA C. NOLD, SBN 301378
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
john.burris@johnburrislaw.com
adante.pointer@johnburrislaw.com
melissa.nold@johnburrislaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
21
Case No: 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD
JOSEPH LEDESMA, an individual; and
JEANNIE LEDESMA, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER; ORDER THEREON
vs.
22
27
CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation,
ROBERT DeMARCO, individually and in his
official capacity as Police Officer for the CITY
OF VALLEJO; AMANDA BLAIN, individually
and in her official capacity as Police Officer
for the CITY OF VALLEJO; and DOES 1-50,
individually and in their official capacities as
Police Officers for the CITY OF VALLEJO,
jointly and severally,
28
Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
ORDER THEREON
-1-
1
Defendants.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY ALL PARTIES to this action by and through
their attorneys of record, that in order to protect the confidentiality of the records
described below, any of said records disclosed are subject to a protective order and
designated as “Confidential Material” as follows:
1.
Records produced by defendants’ in the production of documents
pertaining to:
12
•
13
excessive force or alleged dishonesty against Defendant Blain within the
14
last five years.
15
•
16
the last five years.
18
20
21
22
23
Citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations related to alleged
excessive force or alleged dishonesty against Defendant DeMarco within
17
19
Citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations related to alleged
2.
Confidential material may not be disclosed except as set forth in
paragraphs 3- 5.
3.
Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following persons:
a.
Counsel for any party to this action.
b.
Paralegal, stenographic, clerical and secretarial personnel
regularly employed by counsel referred to in 3(a);
24
25
26
27
28
c.
Court personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in
such
proceedings
as
are
necessarily
incidental
preparation for the trial of this action;
Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
ORDER THEREON
-2-
to
1
d.
2
Any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with
this action, and not otherwise employed by either party;
3
e.
4
Any “in house” expert designated by defendant to testify at
trial in this matter;
5
f.
Witnesses, other than the plaintiffs herein, who may have
6
the
7
proceedings; the witnesses may not leave the depositions
8
with copies of the documents, and shall be bound by the
9
provisions of paragraph 5;
documents
disclosed
to
them
during
deposition
10
g.
Any Neutral Evaluator or other designated ADR provider;
11
h.
Parties to this action; and
12
i.
The jury, should this matter go to trial.
13
4.
Each person to whom disclosure is made, with the exception of counsel
14
who are presumed to know of the contents of this protective order, shall, prior to
15
disclosure: (1) be provided with a copy of this order by the person furnishing him/her
16
such material, and (2) agree on the record or in writing that she/he has read the
17
protective order and that she/he understand the provisions of the protective order. Such
18
person must also consent to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District
19
Court, Eastern District of California, with respect to any proceeding relating to the
20
enforcement of this order. Defendant City of Vallejo and the named defendants herein
21
shall be entitled to retain possession of the original writings described above. Nothing
22
in this paragraph 4 is intended to prevent officials or employees of the City of Vallejo or
23
other authorized government officials or any other persons from having access to the
24
documents if they would have had access in the normal course of their job duties or
25
rights as a citizen. Further, nothing in this order prevents a witness from disclosing
26
events or activities personal to them, i.e., a witness can disclose to others previous
27
28
Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
ORDER THEREON
-3-
1
information given to the City of Vallejo with respect to what she/he saw, heard, or
2
otherwise sensed.
3
5.
At the conclusion of the trial and of any appeal or upon other termination
4
of this litigation, all Confidential Material received under the provision of this order
5
(including any copies made) shall be delivered back to the City of Vallejo. Provisions of
6
this order insofar as they restrict disclosure and use of the material shall be in effect
7
until all Confidential Material (including all copies thereof) are returned to defendants.
8
6.
Should a party intend to file Confidential Material with the court, as an
9
exhibit to a pleading or otherwise, that party must first notify all other parties (through
10
their attorneys), in writing and filed with the court, no less than fourteen days before the
11
intended filing date, giving any such party reasonable notice and an opportunity to apply
12
to the court for an order to file the material under seal. No document shall be filed under
13
seal unless a party secures a court order allowing the filing of a document under seal in
14
accordance with the provisions of E.D. Local Rule 141.
15
7.
Nothing in this order shall preclude a party from showing or disclosing any
16
documents, e.g., deposition transcript, pleading or brief, which otherwise contain
17
Confidential Material as defined in paragraph 1, as long as such document has been
18
redacted so as to prevent disclosure of such Confidential Material.
19
8.
The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party (a) to apply to
20
the Court for a further protective order relating to any Confidential Material or relating to
21
discovery in this litigation; (b) to apply to the Court for an order removing the
22
Confidential Material designation from any document; and (c) to apply to the Court for
23
an order compelling production of documents or modification of this order or for any
24
order permitting disclosure of Confidential Materials beyond the terms of this order.
25
9.
Upon receipt of this Protective Order and disclosure of the Confidential
26
Material, it will be presumed that plaintiffs know the contents of this Protective Order,
27
understand the provisions of this Protective Order and consent to be subject to the
28
Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
ORDER THEREON
-4-
1
jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Eastern District, with respect to any
2
proceeding relating to the enforcement of this Protective Order.
3
4
5
6
10.
Confidential Material disclosed may be used in the litigation of this action
only, and not for any other purpose.
11.
Violation of the terms of this Protective Order MAY SUBJECT a party to
any and all permissible SANCTIONS, including dismissal.
7
8
DATED: December 29, 2017
Respectfully Submitted,
9
/ s / Kelly J. Trujillo
KELLY J. TRUJILLO
Assistant City Attorney
Attorney for Defendants,
CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.
10
11
12
13
14
15
DATED: December 29, 2017
/ s / Melissa Nold
MELISSA C. NOLD
Attorney for Plaintiffs
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: January 10, 2018
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD
STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER;
ORDER THEREON
-5-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?