Ledesma et al v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/10/2018. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CLAUDIA M. QUINTANA City Attorney, SBN 178613 BY: KELLY J. TRUJILLO Assistant City Attorney, SBN 244286 CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall 555 Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 3068 Vallejo, CA 94590 Tel: (707) 648-4545 Fax: (707) 648-4687 Email: kelly.trujillo@cityofvallejo.net Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF VALLEJO, et al. JOHN L. BURRIS ESQ., SBN 69888 ADANTE D. POINTER, SBN 236229 MELISSA C. NOLD, SBN 301378 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 john.burris@johnburrislaw.com adante.pointer@johnburrislaw.com melissa.nold@johnburrislaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 17 18 19 20 21 Case No: 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD JOSEPH LEDESMA, an individual; and JEANNIE LEDESMA, an individual, Plaintiffs, STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON vs. 22 27 CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation, ROBERT DeMARCO, individually and in his official capacity as Police Officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO; AMANDA BLAIN, individually and in her official capacity as Police Officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO; and DOES 1-50, individually and in their official capacities as Police Officers for the CITY OF VALLEJO, jointly and severally, 28 Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON -1- 1 Defendants. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY ALL PARTIES to this action by and through their attorneys of record, that in order to protect the confidentiality of the records described below, any of said records disclosed are subject to a protective order and designated as “Confidential Material” as follows: 1. Records produced by defendants’ in the production of documents pertaining to: 12 • 13 excessive force or alleged dishonesty against Defendant Blain within the 14 last five years. 15 • 16 the last five years. 18 20 21 22 23 Citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations related to alleged excessive force or alleged dishonesty against Defendant DeMarco within 17 19 Citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations related to alleged 2. Confidential material may not be disclosed except as set forth in paragraphs 3- 5. 3. Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following persons: a. Counsel for any party to this action. b. Paralegal, stenographic, clerical and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel referred to in 3(a); 24 25 26 27 28 c. Court personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in such proceedings as are necessarily incidental preparation for the trial of this action; Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON -2- to 1 d. 2 Any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with this action, and not otherwise employed by either party; 3 e. 4 Any “in house” expert designated by defendant to testify at trial in this matter; 5 f. Witnesses, other than the plaintiffs herein, who may have 6 the 7 proceedings; the witnesses may not leave the depositions 8 with copies of the documents, and shall be bound by the 9 provisions of paragraph 5; documents disclosed to them during deposition 10 g. Any Neutral Evaluator or other designated ADR provider; 11 h. Parties to this action; and 12 i. The jury, should this matter go to trial. 13 4. Each person to whom disclosure is made, with the exception of counsel 14 who are presumed to know of the contents of this protective order, shall, prior to 15 disclosure: (1) be provided with a copy of this order by the person furnishing him/her 16 such material, and (2) agree on the record or in writing that she/he has read the 17 protective order and that she/he understand the provisions of the protective order. Such 18 person must also consent to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District 19 Court, Eastern District of California, with respect to any proceeding relating to the 20 enforcement of this order. Defendant City of Vallejo and the named defendants herein 21 shall be entitled to retain possession of the original writings described above. Nothing 22 in this paragraph 4 is intended to prevent officials or employees of the City of Vallejo or 23 other authorized government officials or any other persons from having access to the 24 documents if they would have had access in the normal course of their job duties or 25 rights as a citizen. Further, nothing in this order prevents a witness from disclosing 26 events or activities personal to them, i.e., a witness can disclose to others previous 27 28 Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON -3- 1 information given to the City of Vallejo with respect to what she/he saw, heard, or 2 otherwise sensed. 3 5. At the conclusion of the trial and of any appeal or upon other termination 4 of this litigation, all Confidential Material received under the provision of this order 5 (including any copies made) shall be delivered back to the City of Vallejo. Provisions of 6 this order insofar as they restrict disclosure and use of the material shall be in effect 7 until all Confidential Material (including all copies thereof) are returned to defendants. 8 6. Should a party intend to file Confidential Material with the court, as an 9 exhibit to a pleading or otherwise, that party must first notify all other parties (through 10 their attorneys), in writing and filed with the court, no less than fourteen days before the 11 intended filing date, giving any such party reasonable notice and an opportunity to apply 12 to the court for an order to file the material under seal. No document shall be filed under 13 seal unless a party secures a court order allowing the filing of a document under seal in 14 accordance with the provisions of E.D. Local Rule 141. 15 7. Nothing in this order shall preclude a party from showing or disclosing any 16 documents, e.g., deposition transcript, pleading or brief, which otherwise contain 17 Confidential Material as defined in paragraph 1, as long as such document has been 18 redacted so as to prevent disclosure of such Confidential Material. 19 8. The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party (a) to apply to 20 the Court for a further protective order relating to any Confidential Material or relating to 21 discovery in this litigation; (b) to apply to the Court for an order removing the 22 Confidential Material designation from any document; and (c) to apply to the Court for 23 an order compelling production of documents or modification of this order or for any 24 order permitting disclosure of Confidential Materials beyond the terms of this order. 25 9. Upon receipt of this Protective Order and disclosure of the Confidential 26 Material, it will be presumed that plaintiffs know the contents of this Protective Order, 27 understand the provisions of this Protective Order and consent to be subject to the 28 Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON -4- 1 jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Eastern District, with respect to any 2 proceeding relating to the enforcement of this Protective Order. 3 4 5 6 10. Confidential Material disclosed may be used in the litigation of this action only, and not for any other purpose. 11. Violation of the terms of this Protective Order MAY SUBJECT a party to any and all permissible SANCTIONS, including dismissal. 7 8 DATED: December 29, 2017 Respectfully Submitted, 9 / s / Kelly J. Trujillo KELLY J. TRUJILLO Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Defendants, CITY OF VALLEJO, et al. 10 11 12 13 14 15 DATED: December 29, 2017 / s / Melissa Nold MELISSA C. NOLD Attorney for Plaintiffs 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: January 10, 2018 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:17-cv-00106-MCE-CKD STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; ORDER THEREON -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?