United States of America v. Sweeney et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER re PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT LOGS signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/17. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 ROCHELLE L. RUSSELL (CA No. 244992) United States Department of Justice 3 Environmental and Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section 4 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050 San Francisco, CA 94105 5 Tel: (415) 744-6566 / Fax: (415) 744-6476 6 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 7 GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney 8 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 9 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 554-2780 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 11 LAWRENCE S. BAZEL (CA No. 114641) MAX ROLLENS (CA No. 308984) 12 BRISCOE IVESTER & BAZEL LLP 13 155 Sansome Street, Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 14 Tel: (415) 402-2700 / Fax: (415) 398-5630 15 Attorneys for Defendants John Donnelly Sweeney and Point Buckler Club, LLC 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DONNELLY SWEENEY and POINT BUCKLER CLUB, LLC 2:17-cv-00112-KJM-KJN STIPULATION RE: PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT LOGS ORDER Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation re: Privilege and Work Product Logs; Order 2:17-cv-00112-KJM-KJN 1 Pursuant to the Parties’ Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan, ECF No. 12, and the 2 Court’s direction at the June 8, 2017 status conference, ECF No. 14, the Parties submit the 3 following stipulation and proposed Order regarding the logging of privileged and work product 4 materials in this case. 5 A. 6 PRIVILEGE OR WORK PRODUCT LOGS GENERALLY The parties agree that Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(A), insofar as it sets forth obligations to 7 provide a log of privileged or work product materials, presumptively should not apply to the 8 following communications: 9 i. internal communications within and/or among (a) Briscoe, Ivester & Bazel LLP, 10 or (b) governmental law offices (e.g., the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Environmental 11 Protection Agency (“EPA”) offices of general and regional counsel, and the U.S. Army Corps of 12 Engineers (“Corps”) offices of headquarters and district counsel). 13 ii. communications after October 21, 2015, exclusively between EPA employees and 14 counsel from the EPA or the U.S. Department of Justice previously or currently responsible for 15 or overseeing the case (but not including non-attorney staff-to-staff communications); 16 iii. communications after October 21, 2015, exclusively between Corps employees 17 and counsel from the Corps or the U.S Department of Justice previously or currently responsible 18 for or overseeing the case (but not including non-attorney staff-to-staff communications); 19 iv. communications after October 21, 2015, exclusively between EPA and Corps 20 employees and counsel from the EPA, the Corps, or the U.S. Department of Justice previously or 21 currently responsible for or overseeing the case (but not including non-attorney staff-to-staff 22 communications); 23 v. 24 25 26 27 28 communications exclusively between employees or counsel from the EPA, the Corps, or the U.S. Department of Justice and any confidential litigation consultant; vi. communications exclusively between John Donnelly Sweeney or Point Buckler Club, LLC, and any attorney representing them with respect to the subject matter of this litigation; vii. communications between John Donnelly Sweeney or Point Buckler Club, LLC, and any confidential litigation consultant retained with respect to the subject matter of this litigation; Stipulation re: Privilege and Work Product Logs; Order 2:17-cv-00112-KJM-KJN 1 1 2 viii. any confidential litigation consultant; 3 4 communications between any attorney representing any party on this matter and ix. materials created on or after October 21, 2015 in anticipation of this litigation or for purposes of litigation, by attorneys or by confidential litigation consultants; and 5 x. communications between trial counsel and consultants employed by counsel but 6 excluding communications described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(C)(i)-(iii). 7 B. PRIVILEGE OR WORK PRODUCT LOGS FOR EMBEDDED EMAIL 8 For purposes of a privilege or work product log, an e-mail may be treated as a single 9 document regardless of the number of embedded emails contained within the message body. 10 The privilege log for an e-mail withheld under a claim of privilege, to the extent any is required, 11 shall identify the author, recipient(s), subject, dates and times based on the top-level message, 12 and shall not include data from any e-mail embedded in the message body. However, if an e- 13 mail contains both privileged and non-privileged communications, the non-privileged 14 communications must be produced. This requirement should be satisfied by producing the 15 original of the embedded, non-privileged e-mail or it may be satisfied by producing a redacted 16 version of the privileged e-mail. 17 C. 18 19 STIPULATION TREATED AS BINDING The Parties agree to treat the foregoing stipulation as controlling pending the Court’s consideration of it. 20 Respectfully submitted, 21 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division 22 23 Dated: June 22, 2017 /s/ Rochelle L. Russell ROCHELLE L. RUSSELL, Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: June 22, 2017 /s/ Lawrence S. Bazel LAWRENCE S. BAZEL Attorney for Defendants 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation re: Privilege and Work Product Logs; Order 2:17-cv-00112-KJM-KJN 2 1 2 ORDER In accordance with the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS SO 3 ORDERED. 4 DATED: June 30, 2017. 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation re: Privilege and Work Product Logs; Order 2:17-cv-00112-KJM-KJN 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?