Lee v. City of Sacramento

Filing 84

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/21 ADOPTING 83 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 68 defendant's Motion for Sanctions. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IVAN S. LEE, 12 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-118-JAM-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On March 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 18 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 20 21 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 22 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 23 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 19, 2021, are ADOPTED; 24 25 and 2. Defendant’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 68) is denied. 26 27 28 DATED: April 26, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?