Lee v. City of Sacramento

Filing 84

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/21 ADOPTING 83 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 68 defendant's Motion for Sanctions. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

IVAN S. LEE,

12
13
14

No. 2:17-cv-118-JAM-EFB
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

CITY OF SACRAMENTO,

15

Defendant.

16
17

On March 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

18

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

19

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

20
21

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

22

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

23

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 19, 2021, are ADOPTED;

24
25

and
2. Defendant’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 68) is denied.

26
27
28

DATED: April 26, 2021

/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE