Johnson v. Chan et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/2/18, ORDERING that the motion hearing date of 2/7/2018 is VACATED. Counsel for each party will pay to the Clerk $100.00 within 10 days of this order as sanctions. The motion to compel 18 is STRICKEN. Failure to comply with this order may result in further sanctions. (cc: Financial)(Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-00138 KJM AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SIU KEUNG CHANG, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
On December 29, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion to compel. ECF No. 18. The parties
18
failed to file a Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement or an affidavit at least seven (7) days
19
before the scheduled hearing, and the court issued an order resetting the hearing for February 7,
20
2018. ECF No. 19. The court noted that the parties’ joint statement would be due January 31,
21
2018, and failure to comply with the order would result in monetary sanctions. Id. at 2. The
22
court also noted that local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be
23
grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the
24
inherent power of the Court. The parties again failed to make the required filing of their joint
25
statement.
26
27
28
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion hearing date of February 7, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26
is VACATED;
1
1
2. Counsel for each party will pay to the clerk of court $100.00 within 10 days of this
2
order as sanctions for repeated failures to comply with this court’s orders and the
3
rules of this court;
4
3. The motion to compel at ECF No. 18 is STRICKEN; and
5
4. Failure to comply with this order may result in further sanctions.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 2, 2018
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?