Advanced Laboratories International, LLC v. Valentus International et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/27/17: HEARING as to MOTIONS to COMPEL 24 , 25 and 29 RESET for 1/10/2018 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. The parties shall file a single joint statement regarding all three discovery matters on or before January 3, 2018. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 ADVANCED LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, LLC, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. Case No. 2:17-cv-00141-TLN-CMK 14 VALENTUS INTERNATIONAL; DAVE 15 JORDAN, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, New Hearing Date: January 10, 2018 Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 304, 3rd Floor Judge: Hon. Craig M. Kellison 16 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL Defendants. 17 18 ___________________________________ 19 VALENTUS, INC. and DAVID JORDAN; 20 21 Counterclaimants, v. 22 ADVANCED LABORATORY INTERNATIONAL, LLC; VITAE 23 GLOBAL, LLC; and LOUIS VOLPE; 24 Counterdefendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL (2:17-CV-001141-TLN-CMK) ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the stipulation between the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. Valentus, Inc.’s motions to compel (Docs. 24, 25, and 29), currently set for hearing on 4 November 29, 2017, are reset for hearing in Redding, California, on January 10, 2018, the court’s 5 next available hearing date, at 10:00 a.m.; the parties may appear telephonically at the hearing; and 6 2. The parties shall file a single joint statement regarding all three discovery matters on or 7 8 before January 3, 2018. 9 10 Dated: November 27, 2017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL (2:17-CV-001141-TLN-CMK)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?