Advanced Laboratories International, LLC v. Valentus International et al
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/27/17: HEARING as to MOTIONS to COMPEL 24 , 25 and 29 RESET for 1/10/2018 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. The parties shall file a single joint statement regarding all three discovery matters on or before January 3, 2018. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11 ADVANCED LABORATORIES
INTERNATIONAL, LLC,
12
Plaintiff,
13 v.
Case No. 2:17-cv-00141-TLN-CMK
14 VALENTUS INTERNATIONAL; DAVE
15 JORDAN, and DOES 1-20, inclusive,
New Hearing Date: January 10, 2018
Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 304, 3rd Floor
Judge: Hon. Craig M. Kellison
16
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING
DATE ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL
Defendants.
17
18
___________________________________
19 VALENTUS, INC. and DAVID JORDAN;
20
21
Counterclaimants,
v.
22 ADVANCED LABORATORY
INTERNATIONAL, LLC; VITAE
23 GLOBAL, LLC; and LOUIS VOLPE;
24
Counterdefendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL (2:17-CV-001141-TLN-CMK)
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the stipulation between the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
Valentus, Inc.’s motions to compel (Docs. 24, 25, and 29), currently set for hearing on
4 November 29, 2017, are reset for hearing in Redding, California, on January 10, 2018, the court’s
5 next available hearing date, at 10:00 a.m.; the parties may appear telephonically at the hearing; and
6
2.
The parties shall file a single joint statement regarding all three discovery matters on or
7
8
before January 3, 2018.
9
10
Dated: November 27, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS TO COMPEL (2:17-CV-001141-TLN-CMK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?