Velasquez-Quinonez v. People of State of California

Filing 6

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-0142 JAM AC) signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/2/17. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

OSCAR IVAN VELASQUEZQUINONEZ,
Petitioner,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-0142 AC P

ORDER
v.

15

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,

16

Respondent.

17
18

Petitioner, an inmate who is being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement,

19

proceeding pro se, has filed an application which he designates as one for a writ of error coram

20

nobis, though it appears to actually be a petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

21

He has also brought a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner

22

challenges a conviction issued by the Kern County Superior Court. Kern County is part of the

23

Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See

24

L.R. 120(d).

25

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper

26

division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the

27

court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court

28

will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis.
1

1

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis;

3

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

4
5
6
7
8
9

California sitting in Fresno; and
3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be
filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
DATED: February 2, 2017

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2