Johnson v. Unknown

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/13/2017 DIRECTING the Clerk to close this matter. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MATTHEW LOUIS JOHNSON, 11 12 13 No. 2:17-cv-146-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, 14 Respondent. 15 16 Johnson1 filed a letter with the court requesting that he be “immediately” released. ECF 17 No. 1. The letter, however, is not sufficient to commence a civil action. To commence a civil 18 action, a party must file a complaint or a petition. Fed. R. Civ. P. 3; Rule 3, Rules Governing 19 § 2254 Cases; Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 203 (2003). Accordingly, the court informed 20 Johnson on January 26, 2017, that this matter would be closed if he did not properly commence a 21 civil action within 30 days, by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and either paying the 22 filing fee or filing an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915(a). ECF No. 3. That time period has passed and Johnson has not filed the necessary 24 documents. He did, however, file a letter to the Clerk of the Court stating that he is “not 25 submitting any writs or petitions,” but rather, giving “notice” that CDCR is “failing to comply 26 with the law.” ECF No. 4 at 2. 27 28 1 Johnson, referred to in the caption for administrative purposes as “Petitioner,” is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. 1 2 3 4 As Johnson has not submitted a petition and either paid the filing fee or met the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), there is simply no case before the court. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this matter. DATED: March 13, 2017. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?