Rogers v. Richard et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/6/17 ORDERING It has come to the undersigned's attention that after the conclusion of the October 5, 2017 hearing, plaintiff pursued defendants' counsel into the halls of the cour thouse where he raised his voice to her significantly, threatened her feeling of safety, and ultimately the courtroom deputy felt constrained to accompany defense counsel to an alternate exit for her own safety. This conduct by plaintiff cannot be tolerated in this or any other court. Plaintiff is therefore warned that should such an incident, or anything similar, occur again, the court will impose sanctions on plaintiff that may include dismissal of his lawsuit and/or result in a contempt of court finding. The court expects plaintiff to behave with proper decorum in all further proceedings. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 No. 2:17-cv-000149 JAM GGH KIM EDWARD ROGERS, Plaintiff 13 14 15 16 ORDER v. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., Defendants 17 18 It has come to the undersigned’s attention that after the conclusion of the October 5, 2017 19 hearing, plaintiff pursued defendants’ counsel into the halls of the courthouse where he raised his 20 voice to her significantly, threatened her feeling of safety, and ultimately the courtroom deputy 21 felt constrained to accompany defense counsel to an alternate exit for her own safety. This 22 conduct by plaintiff cannot be tolerated in this or any other court. Plaintiff is therefore warned 23 that should such an incident, or anything similar, occur again, the court will impose sanctions on 24 plaintiff that may include dismissal of his lawsuit and/or result in a contempt of court finding. 25 The court expects plaintiff to behave with proper decorum in all further proceedings. 26 Dated: October 6, 2017 27 28 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?