Olic v. Lizarraga
Filing
19
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/17 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed October 05, 2017, are ADOPTED in full; and Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15 ) is DENEID; respondent is ordered to file an answer to the petition within thirty days of the date of this order. (Becknal, R)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
MILORAD OLIC,
6
7
8
No. 2:17-cv-0155 JAM KJN P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
JOE A. LIZARRAGA,
9
Respondents.
10
11
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
12
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
13
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
14
On October 05, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
15
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
16
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
17
objections to the findings and recommendations.
18
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
19
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED that:
21
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 05, 2017, are adopted in full; and
22
2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is denied; respondent is ordered to file
23
an answer to the petition within thirty days of the date of this order.
24
25
26
DATED: 12/19/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?