Olic v. Lizarraga
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/17/2017 DIRECTING respondent to file and serve within 14 days after the filing date of this order, a supplemental brief that addresses the merits of petitioner's equitable tolling arguments. Within 14 days after service of respondent's supplemental brief, petitioner may file and serve a response. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MILORAD OLIC,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0156 MCE AC P
v.
ORDER
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this habeas
17
18
corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See ECF No. 1. Petitioner challenges his
19
November 7, 2014 disciplinary conviction. Currently pending before the court is respondent’s
20
motion to dismiss this action on the ground that it was commenced beyond the one-year statute of
21
limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). See ECF No. 15. Petitioner timely filed an
22
opposition to the motion, in which he asserts entitlement to both statutory and equitable tolling.
23
See ECF No. 16. Respondent’s reply does not address the merits of petitioner’s arguments in
24
support of equitable tolling. See ECF No. 17 at 3. Therefore, respondent will be directed to
25
submit further briefing on this matter.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Within fourteen days after the filing date of this order, respondent shall file and serve a
3
supplemental brief that addresses the merits of petitioner’s equitable tolling arguments. See ECF
4
No. 16 at 2-8 (particularly Ex. A).
5
6
7
8
2. Within fourteen days after service of respondent’s supplemental brief, petitioner may
file and serve a response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 17, 2017.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?