Gangl v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 8

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/10/17 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT MICHAEL GANGL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-0186 WBS CKD P

v.
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
17

On March 1, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim, and he

18
19

was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was advised that

20

failure to file an amended complaint would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) The thirty days

21

has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

22
23

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

28

////
1

1

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

3

(9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: April 10, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10

2 / gang0186.fta_fr

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2