Parker v. J.P. Morgan et al

Filing 7

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/7/17, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AKIKA PARKER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-0192 GEB DB PS

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

J.P. MORGAN & CHASE BANK, INC.,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, Akika Parker, is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the

18

undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order filed

19

May 3, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted leave to file an

20

amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that

21

order to file an amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has expired, and plaintiff has

22

not responded to the court’s order in any manner.1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

23
24

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25
1

26
27
28

Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the May 3, 2017 order was returned
as undeliverable, return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward, plaintiff was
properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of plaintiff’s current
address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at a party’s address of
record is fully effective.
1

1

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen (14)

3

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

4

objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to

5

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

6

objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal

7

the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

8

Dated: July 7, 2017

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

DLB:6
DB/orders/orders.pro se/parker0192.fta.f&rs

24
25
26
27
28
2