Johnson v. Segerstrom et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/5/17 ORDERING that the petition is DISMISSED with 30 days to amend.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

SADAT LATOUR JOHNSON,

No. 2:17-cv-00201 GGH

11
Petitioner,

12
13
14
15
16

ORDER
v.
KATE POWELL SEGERSTROM, et al.,
Respondents.
Petitioner filed on Petition for Habeas Corpus on January 30, 2017 together with a Petition

17

for Immediate Hearing. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Immediate Hearing (ECF

18

No. 5) is DENIED.

19

Moreover, the petition states no cognizable claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254, that

20

petitioner is being incarcerated in violation of the federal Constitution or federal law. As best as

21

can be discerned, petitioner is simply offended that he is caught up in the state judicial system.

22

Petitioner will be given one opportunity to amend his petition to set forth a cognizable claim.

23

Accordingly, the Clerk shall send petitioner the form for habeas corpus actions used in

24

this district; THE PETITION IS DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Any amended

25

petition shall be filed within thirty days.

26

Dated: February 5, 2017

27
28

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE